Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Fix a possible NULL pointer issue

[Can Guo]

On 2021-01-02 00:05, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 12/31/20 9:44 PM, Can Guo wrote:
> > During system resume/suspend, hba could be NULL. In this case, do not 
> > touch
> > eh_sem.
> >
> > Fixes: 88a92d6ae4fe ("scsi: ufs: Serialize eh_work with system PM 
> > events and async scan")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index e221add..34e2541 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -8896,8 +8896,11 @@ int ufshcd_system_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  	ktime_t start = ktime_get();
> >
> > +	if (!hba)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> >  	down(&hba->eh_sem);
> > -	if (!hba || !hba->is_powered)
> > +	if (!hba->is_powered)
> >  		return 0;
> >
> >  	if ((ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_dev_pwr_mode(hba->spm_lvl) ==
> > @@ -8945,10 +8948,8 @@ int ufshcd_system_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  	ktime_t start = ktime_get();
> >
> > -	if (!hba) {
> > -		up(&hba->eh_sem);
> > +	if (!hba)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > -	}
> >
> >  	if (!hba->is_powered || pm_runtime_suspended(hba->dev))
> >  		/*
>
> Hi Can,
>
> How can ufshcd_system_suspend() or ufshcd_system_resume() be called 
> with a
> NULL argument? In ufshcd_pci_probe() I see that pci_set_drvdata() is 
> called
> before pm_runtime_allow(). ufshcd_pci_remove() calls 
> pm_runtime_forbid().
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.

Hi Bart,

You are right about ufshcd_RUNTIME_suspend/resume() - 
platform_set_drvdata()
is called before pm_runtime_enable(), so runtime suspend/resume cannot 
happen
before pm_runtime_enable() is called. We can remove the sanity checks of
!hba there, they are outdated.

But for ufshcd_SYSTEM_suspend/resume() callbacks (not runtime ones), my
understanding is that system suspend/resume may happen after probe 
(vendor
driver probe calls ufshcd_pltfrm_init()) starts but before 
platform_set_drvdata()
is called, in this case hba is NULL.

int ufshcd_pltfrm_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
		       const struct ufs_hba_variant_ops *vops)
{
...
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hba);

	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
}

Thanks,

Can Guo.