Re: [PATCH 3/4] usb: gadget: u_audio: remove struct uac_req

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:08:13PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> 
> On Tue 29 Dec 2020 at 23:30, Jack Pham <jackp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Greg and Jerome,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 04:01:46PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:35:30PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> >> > 'struct uac_req' purpose is to link 'struct usb_request' to the
> >> > corresponding 'struct uac_rtd_params'. However member req is never
> >> > used. Using the context of the usb request, we can keep track of the
> >> > corresponding 'struct uac_rtd_params' just as well, without allocating
> >> > extra memory.
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c | 58 ++++++++++++---------------
> >> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> This patch doesn't apply, so I can't apply patches 3 or 4 of this series
> >> :(
> >> 
> >> Can you rebase against my usb-testing branch and resend?
> >
> > From the cover letter:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:35:27PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> >> The series depends on this fix [0] by Jack Pham to apply cleanly
> >> 
> >> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20201029175949.6052-1-jackp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > My patch hadn't been picked up by Felipe, so it's not in your tree
> > either, Greg. Should I just resend it to you first?  Or shall I invite
> > Jerome to just include it in v2 of this series?
> 
> Indeed. I rebased on usb-testing and the series applies cleanly with
> Jack's changes, as decribed in the cover-letter.
> 
> If it is easier, I'm happy to include Jack's change in the v2, along
> with the fixed PATCH 2 fixed.
> 
> Greg, would it be OK with you ?

That's fine with me.