Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add PRU consumer bindings

[David Lechner]

> Also, I think you can get rid of 'ti,pruss-gp-mux-sel'. Can't it just
> be an arg cell in 'ti,prus' entries?
>
> Rob

+1 for using cells instead of a separate property.

FYI, we will have a similar issue with the PRUSSEVTSEL signal for the
interrupt controller on the AM18XX. I am still of the opinion (described
in more detail at [1]) that using a cell for this makes for both better
device tree bindings and easier driver implementation. So I am interested
to see what the resolution is here.

[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20190708035243.12170-5-s-anna@xxxxxx/