Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: wireless: realtek: Fix the word association defautly de-faulty

From: Bhaskar Chowdhury
Date: Tue Jan 05 2021 - 05:49:07 EST


On 21:33 Tue 05 Jan 2021, Julian Calaby wrote:
Hi Bhaskar,

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:19 PM Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

s/defautly/de-faulty/p


Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c
index c948dafa0c80..7d02d8abb4eb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/trx.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ bool rtl88ee_is_tx_desc_closed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 hw_queue, u16 index)
u8 own = (u8)rtl88ee_get_desc(hw, entry, true, HW_DESC_OWN);

/*beacon packet will only use the first
- *descriptor defautly,and the own may not
+ *descriptor de-faulty,and the own may not

Really? "de-faultly" isn't any better than "defaultly" and in fact
it's even worse as it breaks up the word "default".

hey, it was written as "defautly" ...and that was simple spelling mistake ..
so,corrected it.

This change doesn't make sense and the comment really needs to be
completely re-written by someone who understands what's going on here
as it barely makes sense.

Thanks,

--
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature