Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: migrate: do not migrate HugeTLB page whose refcount is one

[David Hildenbrand]

On 05.01.21 19:04, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:58 AM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 04.01.21 07:58, Muchun Song wrote:
>>> If the refcount is one when it is migrated, it means that the page
>>> was freed from under us. So we are done and do not need to migrate.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/migrate.c | 6 ++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>>> index 4385f2fb5d18..a6631c4eb6a6 100644
>>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>>> @@ -1279,6 +1279,12 @@ static int unmap_and_move_huge_page(new_page_t get_new_page,
>>>               return -ENOSYS;
>>>       }
>>>
>>> +     if (page_count(hpage) == 1) {
>>> +             /* page was freed from under us. So we are done. */
>>> +             putback_active_hugepage(hpage);
>>> +             return MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS;
>>> +     }
>>> +
>>>       new_hpage = get_new_page(hpage, private);
>>>       if (!new_hpage)
>>>               return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>
>> This series seems to fix quite some important cases (thanks). Do we want
>> to cc stable some/all?
> 
> For this particular one, I don't think so IMHO. It is an optimization
> rather than a bug fix.

I'm rather referring to the actual fixes (I received no cover letter so
I picked the first patch in the series)


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb