Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_hdmac: remove platform data header

[Alexandre Belloni]

On 06/01/2021 11:54:53+0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 28-12-20, 21:30, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > linux/platform_data/dma-atmel.h is only used by the at_hdmac driver. Move
> > the CFG bits definitions back in at_hdmac_regs.h and the remaining
> > definitions in the driver.
> 
> Applied, thanks...
> 
> >  /* Bitfields in CFG */
> > -/* are in at_hdmac.h */
> > +#define ATC_PER_MSB(h)	((0x30U & (h)) >> 4)	/* Extract most significant bits of a handshaking identifier */
> > +
> > +#define	ATC_SRC_PER(h)		(0xFU & (h))	/* Channel src rq associated with periph handshaking ifc h */
> > +#define	ATC_DST_PER(h)		((0xFU & (h)) <<  4)	/* Channel dst rq associated with periph handshaking ifc h */
> > +#define	ATC_SRC_REP		(0x1 <<  8)	/* Source Replay Mod */
> > +#define	ATC_SRC_H2SEL		(0x1 <<  9)	/* Source Handshaking Mod */
> > +#define		ATC_SRC_H2SEL_SW	(0x0 <<  9)
> > +#define		ATC_SRC_H2SEL_HW	(0x1 <<  9)
> > +#define	ATC_SRC_PER_MSB(h)	(ATC_PER_MSB(h) << 10)	/* Channel src rq (most significant bits) */
> > +#define	ATC_DST_REP		(0x1 << 12)	/* Destination Replay Mod */
> > +#define	ATC_DST_H2SEL		(0x1 << 13)	/* Destination Handshaking Mod */
> > +#define		ATC_DST_H2SEL_SW	(0x0 << 13)
> > +#define		ATC_DST_H2SEL_HW	(0x1 << 13)
> > +#define	ATC_DST_PER_MSB(h)	(ATC_PER_MSB(h) << 14)	/* Channel dst rq (most significant bits) */
> > +#define	ATC_SOD			(0x1 << 16)	/* Stop On Done */
> > +#define	ATC_LOCK_IF		(0x1 << 20)	/* Interface Lock */
> > +#define	ATC_LOCK_B		(0x1 << 21)	/* AHB Bus Lock */
> > +#define	ATC_LOCK_IF_L		(0x1 << 22)	/* Master Interface Arbiter Lock */
> > +#define		ATC_LOCK_IF_L_CHUNK	(0x0 << 22)
> > +#define		ATC_LOCK_IF_L_BUFFER	(0x1 << 22)
> > +#define	ATC_AHB_PROT_MASK	(0x7 << 24)	/* AHB Protection */
> > +#define	ATC_FIFOCFG_MASK	(0x3 << 28)	/* FIFO Request Configuration */
> > +#define		ATC_FIFOCFG_LARGESTBURST	(0x0 << 28)
> > +#define		ATC_FIFOCFG_HALFFIFO		(0x1 << 28)
> > +#define		ATC_FIFOCFG_ENOUGHSPACE		(0x2 << 28)
> 
> Make these use BIT() or GENMASK() later..?
> 

Sure but for this patch, I wanted to make it clear that this was just
moving code around.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com