Yep, you're right. 'null-ptr-deref' is not really proper here.This advice is too detailed for 'null-ptr-deref' is known as a general phraseA null-ptr-deref bug is reported by Hulk Robot like this:
Can it be clearer to use the term “null pointer dereference” for the final commit message?
This key word was provided already by the referenced KASAN report.
Sorry, I can understand what you means, but I still disagree with this one, for:
like 'use-after-free' for kernel developer, I think.I suggest to reconsider the use of abbreviations at some places.
>
Sorry, I didn't get your words.Fix it by making …
Would you like to replace this wording by the tag “Fixes”?
'Fix it by' follows the solution
I propose to specify the desired adjustments without such a prefix
in the change description.
In fact, I do considered using 'Fixes' on this one,
Thanks for such information.
but it's hard to tell which specific commit brought this null pointer dereference.
This aspect is unfortunate here. >
Regards,
Markus
.