Re: [PATCH 1/9] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Fix some error codes when setting RDIST base
From: Alexandru Elisei
Date: Wed Jan 06 2021 - 11:33:11 EST
Hi Eric,
On 12/12/20 6:50 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR group doc says we should return
> -EEXIST in case the base address of the redist is already set.
> We currently return -EINVAL.
>
> However we need to return -EINVAL in case a legacy REDIST address
> is attempted to be set while REDIST_REGIONS were set. This case
> is discriminated by looking at the count field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> index 15a6c98ee92f..8e8a862def76 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> @@ -792,8 +792,13 @@ static int vgic_v3_insert_redist_region(struct kvm *kvm, uint32_t index,
> int ret;
>
> /* single rdist region already set ?*/
> - if (!count && !list_empty(rd_regions))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!count && !list_empty(rd_regions)) {
> + rdreg = list_last_entry(rd_regions,
> + struct vgic_redist_region, list);
> + if (rdreg->count)
> + return -EINVAL; /* Mixing REDIST and REDIST_REGION API */
> + return -EEXIST;
> + }
A few instructions below:
if (list_empty(rd_regions)) {
[..]
} else {
rdreg = list_last_entry(rd_regions,
struct vgic_redist_region, list);
[..]
/* Cannot add an explicitly sized regions after legacy region */
if (!rdreg->count)
return -EINVAL;
}
Isn't this testing for the same thing, but using the opposite condition? Or am I
misunderstanding the code (quite likely)?
Looks to me like KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR(KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST{,_REGION})
used to return -EEXIST (from vgic_check_ioaddr()) before commit ccc27bf5be7b7
("KVM: arm/arm64: Helper to register a new redistributor region") which added the
vgic_v3_insert_redist_region() function, so bringing back the -EEXIST return code
looks the right thing to me.
Thanks,
Alex
>
> /* cross the end of memory ? */
> if (base + size < base)