Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] remoteproc: qcom: expose types for COMPILE_TEST

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Tue 05 Jan 20:38 CST 2021, Alex Elder wrote:

> Stub functions are defined for SSR notifier registration in case
> QCOM_RPROC_COMMON is not configured.  As a result, code that uses
> these functions can link successfully even if the common remoteproc
> code is not built.
> 
> Code that registers an SSR notifier function likely needs the
> types defined in "qcom_rproc.h", but those are only exposed if
> QCOM_RPROC_COMMON is enabled.
> 
> Rearrange the conditional definition so the qcom_ssr_notify_data
> structure and qcom_ssr_notify_type enumerated type are defined
> whether or not QCOM_RPROC_COMMON is enabled.
> 

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>

@Jakub, @Dave, as this is a prerequisite for allowing IPA to be compile
tested feel free to merge it together with patch 3.

Regards,
Bjorn

> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h
> index 6470516621749..82b211518136e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc/qcom_rproc.h
> @@ -3,8 +3,6 @@
>  
>  struct notifier_block;
>  
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_RPROC_COMMON)
> -
>  /**
>   * enum qcom_ssr_notify_type - Startup/Shutdown events related to a remoteproc
>   * processor.
> @@ -26,6 +24,8 @@ struct qcom_ssr_notify_data {
>  	bool crashed;
>  };
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_RPROC_COMMON)
> +
>  void *qcom_register_ssr_notifier(const char *name, struct notifier_block *nb);
>  int qcom_unregister_ssr_notifier(void *notify, struct notifier_block *nb);
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>