Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: dmaengine: Add MediaTek Command-Queue DMA controller bindings

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 2:25 AM EastL <EastL.Lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 09:58 -0700, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 05:30:44PM +0800, EastL Lee wrote:
> > > Document the devicetree bindings for MediaTek Command-Queue DMA controller
> > > which could be found on MT6779 SoC or other similar Mediatek SoCs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: EastL Lee <EastL.Lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/dma/mtk-cqdma.yaml         | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > Use compatible string for filename:
> OK
> >
> > mediatek,cqdma.yaml
> >
> > >  1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/mtk-cqdma.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/mtk-cqdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/mtk-cqdma.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..a76a263
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/mtk-cqdma.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/mtk-cqdma.yaml#
> >
> > Don't forget to update this.
> OK
> >
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: MediaTek Command-Queue DMA controller Device Tree Binding
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - EastL Lee <EastL.Lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > +
> > > +description:
> > > +  MediaTek Command-Queue DMA controller (CQDMA) on Mediatek SoC
> > > +  is dedicated to memory-to-memory transfer through queue based
> > > +  descriptor management.
> > > +
> > > +allOf:
> > > +  - $ref: "dma-controller.yaml#"
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - enum:
> > > +          - mediatek,mt6765-cqdma
> > > +          - mediatek,mt6779-cqdma
> > > +      - const: mediatek,cqdma
> > > +
> > > +  reg:
> > > +    minItems: 1
> > > +    maxItems: 5
> > > +    description:
> > > +        A base address of MediaTek Command-Queue DMA controller,
> > > +        a channel will have a set of base address.
> > > +
> > > +  interrupts:
> > > +    minItems: 1
> > > +    maxItems: 5
> > > +    description:
> > > +        A interrupt number of MediaTek Command-Queue DMA controller,
> > > +        one interrupt number per dma-channels.
> > > +
> > > +  clocks:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +  clock-names:
> > > +    const: cqdma
> > > +
> > > +  dma-channel-mask:
> > > +    description:
> > > +       For DMA capability, We will know the addressing capability of
> > > +       MediaTek Command-Queue DMA controller through dma-channel-mask.
> > > +      minimum: 1
> > > +      maximum: 63
> >
> > Indentation is wrong here so this has no effect.
> I'll fix it
> >
> > A mask of 63 is 6 channels...
> In my opinion, kernel dma mask if for 32/64 bit capability...
> If I don't set dma mask I will get fail on DMATEST.

As in the kernel's 'dma_mask'? That's something entirely different.
The driver should set the mask to the max the device supports.
Typically this is a 32-bit or 64-bit mask. The default is 32-bit. If
the SoC has limitations in its buses, then you need to use
'dma-ranges' in DT which will in turn set the bus_dma_limit.

For the above, the purpose is if you have sparsely allocated DMA channels.

Rob