[RFC PATCH] x86/mce: Add ppin and microcode to mce trace

[Tony Luck]

Steven,

I've been remiss about updating the mce_record trace as new fields
have been added to "struct mce". What are the ABI implications of a
patch like the one below (sample only ... there are a couple more fields
that may need to be added)?

Are there any size limitations that I might hit adding more items to
this record?

Thanks

-Tony

---
 include/trace/events/mce.h | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/mce.h b/include/trace/events/mce.h
index 1391ada0da3b..cf0e8b9920b7 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/mce.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/mce.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mce_record,
 		__field(	u8,		cs		)
 		__field(	u8,		bank		)
 		__field(	u8,		cpuvendor	)
+		__field(	u64,		ppin		)
+		__field(	u32,		microcode	)
 	),
 
 	TP_fast_assign(
@@ -53,9 +55,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mce_record,
 		__entry->cs		= m->cs;
 		__entry->bank		= m->bank;
 		__entry->cpuvendor	= m->cpuvendor;
+		__entry->ppin		= m->ppin;
+		__entry->microcode	= m->microcode;
 	),
 
-	TP_printk("CPU: %d, MCGc/s: %llx/%llx, MC%d: %016Lx, IPID: %016Lx, ADDR/MISC/SYND: %016Lx/%016Lx/%016Lx, RIP: %02x:<%016Lx>, TSC: %llx, PROCESSOR: %u:%x, TIME: %llu, SOCKET: %u, APIC: %x",
+	TP_printk("CPU: %d, MCGc/s: %llx/%llx, MC%d: %016Lx, IPID: %016Lx, ADDR/MISC/SYND: %016Lx/%016Lx/%016Lx, RIP: %02x:<%016Lx>, TSC: %llx, PROCESSOR: %u:%x, TIME: %llu, SOCKET: %u, APIC: %x, PPIN: %llx, MICROCODE: %x",
 		__entry->cpu,
 		__entry->mcgcap, __entry->mcgstatus,
 		__entry->bank, __entry->status,
@@ -66,7 +70,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mce_record,
 		__entry->cpuvendor, __entry->cpuid,
 		__entry->walltime,
 		__entry->socketid,
-		__entry->apicid)
+		__entry->apicid, __entry->ppin, __entry->microcode)
 );
 
 #endif /* _TRACE_MCE_H */
-- 
2.21.1