Re: [PATCH v5] pgo: add clang's Profile Guided Optimization infrastructure

From: Bill Wendling
Date: Sun Jan 17 2021 - 21:36:47 EST


On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 4:27 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [ big snip ]

[More snippage.]

> [ CC Fangrui ]
>
> With the attached...
>
> [PATCH v3] module: Ignore _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ when warning for
> undefined symbols
>
> ...I was finally able to boot into a rebuild PGO-optimized Linux-kernel.
> For details see ClangBuiltLinux issue #1250 "Unknown symbol
> _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ loading kernel modules".
>
Thanks for confirming that this works with the above patch.

> @ Bill Nick Sami Nathan
>
> 1, Can you say something of the impact passing "LLVM_IAS=1" to make?

The integrated assembler and this option are more-or-less orthogonal
to each other. One can still use the GNU assembler with PGO. If you're
having an issue, it may be related to ClangBuiltLinux issue #1250.

> 2. Can you please try Nick's DWARF v5 support patchset v5 and
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5=y (see attachments)?
>
I know Nick did several tests with PGO. He may have looked into it
already, but we can check.

> I would like to know what the impact of the Clang's Integrated
> Assembler and DWARF v5 are.
>
> I dropped both means...
>
> 1. Do not pass "LLVM_IAS=1" to make.
> 2. Use default DWARF v2 (with Nick's patchset: CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF2=y).
>
> ...for a successfull build and boot on bare metal.
>

[Next message]

> On each rebuild I need to pass to make ...?
>
> LLVM=1 -fprofile-use=vmlinux.profdata
>
Yes.

> Did you try together with passing LLVM_IAS=1 to make?

One of my tests was with the integrated assembler enabled. Are you
finding issues with it?

The problem with using top-of-tree clang is that it's not necessarily
stable. You could try using the clang 11.x release (changing the
"CLANG_VERSION >= 120000" in kernel/pgo/Kconfig/ to "CLANG_VERSION >=
110000").

-bw