RE: dmaengine : xilinx_dma two issues

From: Radhey Shyam Pandey
Date: Sun Jan 17 2021 - 23:34:03 EST

Next message: Samuel Holland: "Re: [PATCH v3 19/21] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add Allwinner H616 .dtsi file"
Previous message: Samuel Holland: "Re: [PATCH v3 18/21] dt-bindings: allwinner: Add H616 compatible strings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2021 1:00 AM
> To: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radheys@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>; Vinod Koul
> <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; Matthew Murrian
> <matthew.murrian@xxxxxxxxxx>; Romain Perier
> <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Marc
> Ferland <ferlandm@xxxxxxxxx>; Sebastian von Ohr
> <vonohr@xxxxxxxxxxx>; dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linux ARM <linux-
> arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel <linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx; Shravya Kumbham
> <shravyak@xxxxxxxxxx>; git <git@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: dmaengine : xilinx_dma two issues
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:13 AM Radhey Shyam Pandey <radheys@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Radhey Shyam Pandey
> > > Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 10:50 AM
> > > To: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@xxxxxxxxx>; Dan Williams
> > > <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>; Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal
> Simek
> > > <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; Matthew Murrian
> <matthew.murrian@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> > > Romain Perier <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > > <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Marc Ferland <ferlandm@xxxxxxxxx>; Sebastian von
> Ohr
> > > <vonohr@xxxxxxxxxxx>; dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linux ARM <linux-
> > > arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel <linux-
> > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Shravya Kumbham <shravyak@xxxxxxxxxx>; git
> > > <git@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: RE: dmaengine : xilinx_dma two issues
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 10:14 AM
> > > > To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>; Vinod Koul
> > > > <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; Radhey
> Shyam
> > > > Pandey <radheys@xxxxxxxxxx>; Matthew Murrian
> > > > <matthew.murrian@xxxxxxxxxx>; Romain Perier
> > > <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx>;
> > > > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Marc Ferland
> > > > <ferlandm@xxxxxxxxx>; Sebastian von Ohr <vonohr@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > > > dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linux ARM <linux-
> > > > arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel <linux-
> > > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Subject: dmaengine : xilinx_dma two issues
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to get the 5.10 kernel up and running for our system, and
> > > > I'm running into a couple of issues with xilinx_dma.
> > > + (Xilinx mailing list)
> > >
> > > Thanks for bringing the issues to our notice. Replies inline.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > First, commit 14ccf0aab46e 'dmaengine: xilinx_dma: In dma channel
> > > > probe fix node order dependency' breaks our usage. Before this
> commit a
> > > call to:
> > > > dma_request_chan(&indio_dev->dev, "axi_dma_0"); returns fine, but
> > > > after that commit it returns -19. The reason for this seems to be that
> > > > the only channel that is setup is channel 1 (chan->id is 1 in
> > > xilinx_dma_chan_probe()).
> > > > However in
> > > > of_dma_xilinx_xlate() chan_id is gets set to 0 (int chan_id =
> > > > dma_spec-
> > > > >args[0];), which causes the:
> > > > !xdev->chan[chan_id]
> > > > test to fail in of_dma_xilinx_xlate()
> > >
> > > What is the channel number passed in
> > > dmaclient DT?
> >
> > Any update on this issue?
> >
> > >
> > > dmas = <& axi_dma_0 1>
> > > dma-names = "axi_dma_0"
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Our device-tree entry looks like this:
> > > > axi_dma_0: dma@80002000 {
> > > > status = "okay";
> > > > #dma-cells = <1>;
> > > > compatible = "xlnx,axi-dma-1.00.a";
> > > > interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > > > interrupts = <0 89 4>;
> > > > reg = <0x0 0x80002000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > > > xlnx,addrwidth = <0x20>;
> > > > clocks = <&zynqmp_clk LPD_LSBUS>, <&zynqmp_clk LPD_LSBUS>,
> > > > <&zynqmp_clk LPD_LSBUS>, <&zynqmp_clk LPD_LSBUS>;
> > > > clock-names = "s_axi_lite_aclk", "m_axi_sg_aclk",
> > > > "m_axi_mm2s_aclk", "m_axi_s2mm_aclk";
> > > > dma-channel@80002030 {
> > > > compatible = "xlnx,axi-dma-s2mm-channel";
> > > > dma-channels = <0x1>;
> > > > interrupts = <0 89 4>;
> > > > xlnx,datawidth = <0x20>;
> > > > xlnx,device-id = <0x0>;
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > This is on a 5.10.1 kernel on arm64 zynqmp hardware.
> > > >
> > > > The second issue goes a little further back to commit e81274cd6b526
> > > > 'dmaengine: add support to dynamic register/unregister of channels'.
> > > > After this commit even just removing the module 'rmmod xilinx_dma',
> > > > without ever using it, results in a kernel oops like this:
> > > > [ 37.214568] xilinx-vdma 80002000.dma: ch 0: SG disabled
> > > > [ 37.219807] xilinx-vdma 80002000.dma: WARN: Device release is not
> > > > defined so it is not safe to unbind this driver while in use
> > > > [ 37.231299] xilinx-vdma 80002000.dma: Xilinx AXI DMA Engine Driver
> > > > Probed!!
> > > > [ 42.100660] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
> > > > address dead000000000108
> > > > [ 42.108598] Mem abort info:
> > > > [ 42.111393] ESR = 0x96000044
> > > > [ 42.114443] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> > > > [ 42.119744] SET = 0, FnV = 0
> > > > [ 42.122794] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> > > > [ 42.125918] Data abort info:
> > > > [ 42.128789] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000044
> > > > [ 42.132617] CM = 0, WnR = 1
> > > > [ 42.135577] [dead000000000108] address between user and kernel
> > > > address ranges
> > > > [ 42.142705] Internal error: Oops: 96000044 [#1] SMP
> > > > [ 42.147566] Modules linked in: xilinx_dma(-) clk_xlnx_clock_wizard
> > > > uio_pdrv_genirq
> > > > [ 42.155139] CPU: 1 PID: 2075 Comm: rmmod Not tainted
> > > > 5.10.1-00026-g3a2e6dd7a05-dirty #192
> > > > [ 42.163302] Hardware name: Enclustra XU5 SOM (DT)
> > > > [ 42.167992] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> > > > [ 42.173996] pc : xilinx_dma_chan_remove+0x74/0xa0 [xilinx_dma]
> > > > [ 42.179815] lr : xilinx_dma_chan_remove+0x70/0xa0 [xilinx_dma]
> > > > [ 42.185636] sp : ffffffc01112bca0
> > > > [ 42.188935] x29: ffffffc01112bca0 x28: ffffff80402ea640
> > > > [ 42.194238] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
> > > > [ 42.199542] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
> > > > [ 42.204845] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000
> > > > [ 42.210149] x21: ffffffc0088a2028 x20: ffffff8040c08410
> > > > [ 42.215452] x19: ffffff80423fa480 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> > > > [ 42.220756] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> > > > [ 42.226059] x15: ffffffc010ce88c8 x14: 0000000000000040
> > > > [ 42.231363] x13: ffffff0000000000 x12: ffffffffffffffff
> > > > [ 42.236667] x11: 0000000000000028 x10: ffffffff7fffffff
> > > > [ 42.241970] x9 : ffffffff00f0dfe0 x8 : 0000000000000000
> > > > [ 42.247273] x7 : ffffffc010da4000 x6 : 0000000000000000
> > > > [ 42.252577] x5 : 0000000000210d00 x4 : ffffffc010da4da0
> > > > [ 42.257881] x3 : ffffff80423fa578 x2 : 0000000000000000
> > > > [ 42.263184] x1 : dead000000000100 x0 : dead000000000122
> > > > [ 42.268488] Call trace:
> > > > [ 42.270923] xilinx_dma_chan_remove+0x74/0xa0 [xilinx_dma]
> > > > [ 42.276399] xilinx_dma_remove+0x3c/0x70 [xilinx_dma]
> > > > [ 42.281446] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x38
> > > > [ 42.285530] device_release_driver_internal+0xec/0x1a8
> > > > [ 42.290659] driver_detach+0x64/0xd8
> > > > [ 42.294226] bus_remove_driver+0x58/0xb8
> > > > [ 42.298133] driver_unregister+0x30/0x60
> > > > [ 42.302048] platform_driver_unregister+0x14/0x20
> > > > [ 42.306744] xilinx_vdma_driver_exit+0x18/0x978 [xilinx_dma]
> > > > [ 42.312396] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x1e4/0x270
> > > > [ 42.317178] el0_svc_common.constprop.4+0x68/0x170
> > > > [ 42.321959] do_el0_svc+0x70/0x90
> > > > [ 42.325267] el0_svc+0x14/0x20
> > > > [ 42.328313] el0_sync_handler+0x90/0xb8
> > > > [ 42.332141] el0_sync+0x158/0x180
> > > > [ 42.335442] Code: 95dfce29 9103c260 95de7ffb a9490261 (f9000420)
> > > > [ 42.341525] ---[ end trace dbd90aeb5ca71943 ]---
> > > >
> > > > So if I use the 04c2bc2bede1 (commit before 14ccf0aab46e) version of
> > > > xilinx_dma.c and never remove the module then it is working with the
> > > > 5.10.1 kernel.
> > >
> > > Ok, we will analyze this issue and report back the findings.
> >
> > + Dave
> >
> > I was able to reproduce this crash on the unloading xilinx_dma module.
> > This is introduced due to the e81274cd6b526 mainline commit added
> > in the 5.6 kernel version. The crash is coming from -
> >
> > xilinx_dma_chan_remove+0x74/0xa0:
> > __list_del at ./include/linux/list.h:112
> > (inlined by) __list_del_entry at./include/linux/list.h:135
> > (inlined by) list_del at ./include/linux/list.h:146
> > (inlined by) xilinx_dma_chan_remove at
> drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c:2546
> >
> > Looking into e81274cd6b526 commit - It deletes channel device_node
> entry.
> > Same channel device_node entry is also deleted in
> xilinx_dma_chan_remove
> > as a result we see this crash.
> >
> > @@ -993,12 +1007,22 @@ static
> > void __dma_async_device_channel_unregister(struct dma_device *device,
> > "%s called while %d clients hold a reference\n",
> > __func__, chan->client_count);
> > mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex);
> > + list_del(&chan->device_node);
> > + device->chancnt--;
>
> OK, so following the above if I remove the list_del() from
> xilinx_dma_chan_remove() like this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c
> index 22faea653ea8..ebe8ec6a040c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.c
> @@ -2542,8 +2542,6 @@ static void xilinx_dma_chan_remove(struct
> xilinx_dma_chan *chan)
> free_irq(chan->irq, chan);
>
> tasklet_kill(&chan->tasklet);
> -
> - list_del(&chan->common.device_node);
> }
>
> static int axidma_clk_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct clk **axi_clk,
>
> Then this fixes the oops on remove. As a side note it seems that if

Thanks for the update. Yes as expected the issue is because device_node
is deleted twice. I will start a separate discussion thread with Dave and
get the background on why in commit # e81274cd6b526 was added to
also delete device_node in __dma_async_device_channel_unregister.

> the oops has already happened then the Software System Reset doesn't
> work in our system.
>
> -Paul
>
> >
> > I will let Dave comment on the background of this change. In
> > dmaengine driver - we are adding channel device node entry
> > so deleting it in the exit path looks fine to me. Also, I checked
> > other dma drivers are also deleting channel device_node entry
> > in .remove so it likely a common problem.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully, this will be clear to someone how these issues can be
> > > > resolved. In general we've been very happy using the xilinx dma.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not subscribed to the linux-kernel ML so if you need any further
> > > > info or testing just keep me in the to: list.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Paul

Next message: Samuel Holland: "Re: [PATCH v3 19/21] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add Allwinner H616 .dtsi file"
Previous message: Samuel Holland: "Re: [PATCH v3 18/21] dt-bindings: allwinner: Add H616 compatible strings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]