Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] static_call: Pull some static_call declarations to the type headers

[Jürgen Groß]

On 18.01.21 15:12, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Some static call declarations are going to be needed on low level header
> files. Move the necessary material to the dedicated static call types
> header to avoid inclusion dependency hell.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>

Could the patches please be reordered to have this one first in the
series? I could make use of it in my paravirt simplification series.

I'll include this patch (in slightly modified form. i.e. without the
__static_call_return0() parts) in my series in order to make it
build.

My tests suggest you should also update
tools/include/linux/static_call_types.h


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature