Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] x86/alternative: support "not feature" and ALTERNATIVE_TERNARY

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:35:42PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> In fact this should rather be named "X86_FEATURE_TRUE", as this is its
> semantics.
>
> And I think I can define it to the value 0xffff instead of using a
> "real" bit for it.

A real bit is cheap - a special value to pay attention to in the future
not so much. Also we do have X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS already which has a
similar purpose...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette