Re: [PATCH v1] vdpa/mlx5: Fix memory key MTT population

From: Eli Cohen
Date: Wed Jan 20 2021 - 00:38:50 EST


On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 04:38:55PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

Hi Michael,
this patch is a fix. Are you going to merge it?

>
> On 2021/1/7 下午3:18, Eli Cohen wrote:
> > map_direct_mr() assumed that the number of scatter/gather entries
> > returned by dma_map_sg_attrs() was equal to the number of segments in
> > the sgl list. This led to wrong population of the mkey object. Fix this
> > by properly referring to the returned value.
> >
> > The hardware expects each MTT entry to contain the DMA address of a
> > contiguous block of memory of size (1 << mr->log_size) bytes.
> > dma_map_sg_attrs() can coalesce several sg entries into a single
> > scatter/gather entry of contiguous DMA range so we need to scan the list
> > and refer to the size of each s/g entry.
> >
> > In addition, get rid of fill_sg() which effect is overwritten by
> > populate_mtts().
> >
> > Fixes: 94abbccdf291 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add shared memory registration code")
> > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V0->V1:
> > 1. Fix typos
> > 2. Improve changelog
>
>
> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> >
> > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h | 1 +
> > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h
> > index 5c92a576edae..08f742fd2409 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct mlx5_vdpa_direct_mr {
> > struct sg_table sg_head;
> > int log_size;
> > int nsg;
> > + int nent;
> > struct list_head list;
> > u64 offset;
> > };
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c
> > index 4b6195666c58..d300f799efcd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c
> > @@ -25,17 +25,6 @@ static int get_octo_len(u64 len, int page_shift)
> > return (npages + 1) / 2;
> > }
> > -static void fill_sg(struct mlx5_vdpa_direct_mr *mr, void *in)
> > -{
> > - struct scatterlist *sg;
> > - __be64 *pas;
> > - int i;
> > -
> > - pas = MLX5_ADDR_OF(create_mkey_in, in, klm_pas_mtt);
> > - for_each_sg(mr->sg_head.sgl, sg, mr->nsg, i)
> > - (*pas) = cpu_to_be64(sg_dma_address(sg));
> > -}
> > -
> > static void mlx5_set_access_mode(void *mkc, int mode)
> > {
> > MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, access_mode_1_0, mode & 0x3);
> > @@ -45,10 +34,18 @@ static void mlx5_set_access_mode(void *mkc, int mode)
> > static void populate_mtts(struct mlx5_vdpa_direct_mr *mr, __be64 *mtt)
> > {
> > struct scatterlist *sg;
> > + int nsg = mr->nsg;
> > + u64 dma_addr;
> > + u64 dma_len;
> > + int j = 0;
> > int i;
> > - for_each_sg(mr->sg_head.sgl, sg, mr->nsg, i)
> > - mtt[i] = cpu_to_be64(sg_dma_address(sg));
> > + for_each_sg(mr->sg_head.sgl, sg, mr->nent, i) {
> > + for (dma_addr = sg_dma_address(sg), dma_len = sg_dma_len(sg);
> > + nsg && dma_len;
> > + nsg--, dma_addr += BIT(mr->log_size), dma_len -= BIT(mr->log_size))
> > + mtt[j++] = cpu_to_be64(dma_addr);
> > + }
> > }
> > static int create_direct_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct mlx5_vdpa_direct_mr *mr)
> > @@ -64,7 +61,6 @@ static int create_direct_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct mlx5_vdpa_direct
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > MLX5_SET(create_mkey_in, in, uid, mvdev->res.uid);
> > - fill_sg(mr, in);
> > mkc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(create_mkey_in, in, memory_key_mkey_entry);
> > MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, lw, !!(mr->perm & VHOST_MAP_WO));
> > MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, lr, !!(mr->perm & VHOST_MAP_RO));
> > @@ -276,8 +272,8 @@ static int map_direct_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct mlx5_vdpa_direct_mr
> > done:
> > mr->log_size = log_entity_size;
> > mr->nsg = nsg;
> > - err = dma_map_sg_attrs(dma, mr->sg_head.sgl, mr->nsg, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, 0);
> > - if (!err)
> > + mr->nent = dma_map_sg_attrs(dma, mr->sg_head.sgl, mr->nsg, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, 0);
> > + if (!mr->nent)
> > goto err_map;
> > err = create_direct_mr(mvdev, mr);
>