Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.10-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 12:50:24PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 11:14, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 19:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release.
> > > There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.10-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for testing them all and letting me know.

greg k-h