Re: LTP: madvise08.c:203: TFAIL: No sequence in dump after MADV_DODUMP.
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Mon Jan 25 2021 - 10:49:06 EST
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:48 PM Naresh Kamboju
<naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> LTP syscalls madvise08 test case failed on all devices from
> Linux next 20210118 to till day.
> strace log attached to this email and link provided below.
>
> BAD: next-20210118
> GOOD: next-20210115
>
> This failure is easily reproducible on Linux next tag 20210118 above.
>
> tst_test.c:1250: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 15m 00s
> madvise08.c:73: TINFO: Temporary core pattern is
> '/scratch/ltp-2nftQzNI1K/HclFMH/dump-%p'
> madvise08.c:112: TINFO: Dump file should be dump-10109
> madvise08.c:196: TPASS: madvise(..., MADV_DONTDUMP)
> madvise08.c:112: TINFO: Dump file should be dump-10110
> madvise08.c:203: TFAIL: No sequence in dump after MADV_DODUMP.
>
> strace log,
> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2184866#L1257
Ok, so in this part of the log,
[pid 485] --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_DUMPED,
si_pid=487, si_uid=0, si_status=SIGABRT, si_utime=0, si_stime=0} ---
[pid 485] write(2, \"madvise08.c:117: \33[1;34mTINFO: \33\"...,
64madvise08.c:117: [1;34mTINFO: [0mDump file should be dump-487
) = 64
[pid 485] access(\"dump-487\", F_OK) = 0
[pid 485] openat(AT_FDCWD, \"dump-487\", O_RDONLY) = 3
[pid 485] read(3,
\"\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\4\0>\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\"...,
1024) = 1024
[pid 485] read(3,
\"\0\320\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\340\375\24\304\177\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\0\0\0\0\"...,
1024) = 292
[pid 485] read(3, \"\", 1024) = 0
[pid 485] close(3) = 0
[pid 485] write(2, \"madvise08.c:208: \33[1;31mTFAIL: \33\"...,
74madvise08.c:208: [1;31mTFAIL: [0mNo sequence in dump after
MADV_DODUMP.
it seems that the data that was requested to be dumped with MADV_DODUMP is
indeed completely absent.
There was exactly one commit that got merged between next-20210115 and
next-20120118
related to core dumps: 8a3cc755b138 ("coredump: don't bother with
do_truncate()").
Adding Al Viro to Cc for that.
Naresh, could you try reverting that patch?
Arnd