Re: [PATCH v3] PM / clk: make PM clock layer compatible with clocks that must sleep

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Mon, 25 Jan 2021, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 12:07 AM Nicolas Pitre <npitre@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > A note on sparse:
> > According to https://lwn.net/Articles/109066/ there are things
> > that sparse can't cope with. In particular, pm_clk_op_lock() and
> > pm_clk_op_unlock() may or may not lock/unlock psd->lock depending on
> > some runtime condition. To work around that we tell sparse the lock
> > is always untaken for the purpose of static analisys.
> 
> It looks like sparse is still complaining:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/600dc681.3mAl9WQXnragfNZk%25lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

Would you happen to still have one of those randconfig configuration?

I'd like to know why sparse complains about 3 out of 93 configs.


Nicolas