Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/26] arm64: kvm: Add standalone ticket spinlock implementation for use at hyp
From: Will Deacon
Date: Mon Feb 01 2021 - 12:29:24 EST
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:15:01PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We will soon need to synchronise multiple CPUs in the hyp text at EL2.
> The qspinlock-based locking used by the host is overkill for this purpose
> and relies on the kernel's "percpu" implementation for the MCS nodes.
>
> Implement a simple ticket locking scheme based heavily on the code removed
> by commit c11090474d70 ("arm64: locking: Replace ticket lock implementation
> with qspinlock").
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7584c397bbac
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * A stand-alone ticket spinlock implementation for use by the non-VHE
> + * KVM hypervisor code running at EL2.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC
> + * Author: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * Heavily based on the implementation removed by c11090474d70 which was:
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ARM64_KVM_NVHE_SPINLOCK_H__
> +#define __ARM64_KVM_NVHE_SPINLOCK_H__
> +
> +#include <asm/alternative.h>
> +#include <asm/lse.h>
> +
> +typedef union hyp_spinlock {
> + u32 __val;
> + struct {
> +#ifdef __AARCH64EB__
> + u16 next, owner;
> +#else
> + u16 owner, next;
> + };
> +#endif
Looks like I put this #endif in the wrong place; probably needs to be a line
higher.
Will