Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: AC: Clean up printing messages

[Hanjun Guo]

Hi Rafael,

On 2021/2/3 2:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Replace the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances
> in ac.c with acpi_handle_debug() and acpi_handle_info() calls,
> respectively, which among other things causes the excessive log
> level of the messages previously printed via ACPI_EXCEPTION() to
> be more adequate.
>
> Drop the _COMPONENT and ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions that are not
> used any more, drop the no longer needed ACPI_AC_COMPONENT definition
> from the headers and update the documentation accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2: Changelog update
>
> ---
>   Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst |    1 -
>   drivers/acpi/ac.c                           |   12 +++++-------
>   drivers/acpi/sysfs.c                        |    1 -
>   include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h                 |    1 -
>   4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
> +++ linux-pm/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ shows the supported mask values, current
>       ACPI_CA_DISASSEMBLER            0x00000800
>       ACPI_COMPILER                   0x00001000
>       ACPI_TOOLS                      0x00002000
> -    ACPI_AC_COMPONENT               0x00020000
>       ACPI_BATTERY_COMPONENT          0x00040000
>       ACPI_BUTTON_COMPONENT           0x00080000
>       ACPI_SBS_COMPONENT              0x00100000
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ac.c

In this file, printk() is still using, how about convert them
all into pr_*? I think patch on top your or update this patch
are both OK.

Thanks
Hanjun