Re: [amdgpu] deadlock

From: Daniel Gomez
Date: Wed Feb 03 2021 - 06:47:01 EST

Next message: Michael Ellerman: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/vdso: fix unnecessary rebuilds of vgettimeofday.o"
Previous message: Ionela Voinescu: "Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback"
In reply to: Daniel Gomez: "Re: [amdgpu] deadlock"
Next in thread: Christian König: "Re: [amdgpu] deadlock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:47, Daniel Gomez <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:17, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:51 AM Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 03.02.21 um 09:48 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:36 AM Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> Hi Daniel,
> > > >>
> > > >> this is not a deadlock, but rather a hardware lockup.
> > > > Are you sure? Ime getting stuck in dma_fence_wait has generally good
> > > > chance of being a dma_fence deadlock. GPU hang should never result in
> > > > a forever stuck dma_fence.
> > >
> > > Yes, I'm pretty sure. Otherwise the hardware clocks wouldn't go up like
> > > this.
> >
> > Maybe clarifying, could be both. TDR should notice and get us out of
> > this, but if there's a dma_fence deadlock and we can't re-emit or
> > force complete the pending things, then we're stuck for good.
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > Question is rather why we end up in the userptr handling for GFX? Our
> > > ROCm OpenCL stack shouldn't use this.
> > >
> > > > Daniel, can you pls re-hang your machine and then dump backtraces of
> > > > all tasks into dmesg with sysrq-t, and then attach that? Without all
> > > > the backtraces it's tricky to construct the full dependency chain of
> > > > what's going on. Also is this plain -rc6, not some more patches on
> > > > top?
> > >
> > > Yeah, that's still a good idea to have.
>
> Here the full backtrace dmesg logs after the hang:
> https://pastebin.com/raw/kzivm2L3
>
> This is another dmesg log with the backtraces after SIGKILL the matrix process:
> (I didn't have the sysrq enable at the time):
> https://pastebin.com/raw/pRBwGcj1

I've now removed all our v4l2 patches and did the same test with the 'plain'
mainline version (-rc6).

Reference: 3aaf0a27ffc29b19a62314edd684b9bc6346f9a8

Same error, same behaviour. Full dmesg log attached:
https://pastebin.com/raw/KgaEf7Y1
Note:
dmesg with sysrq-t before running the test starts in [ 122.016502]
sysrq: Show State
dmesg with sysrq-t after the test starts in: [ 495.587671] sysrq: Show State

>
> > >
> > > Christian.
> > >
> > > > -Daniel
> > > >
> > > >> Which OpenCl stack are you using?
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Christian.
> > > >>
> > > >> Am 03.02.21 um 09:33 schrieb Daniel Gomez:
> > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have a deadlock with the amdgpu mainline driver when running in parallel two
> > > >>> OpenCL applications. So far, we've been able to replicate it easily by executing
> > > >>> clinfo and MatrixMultiplication (from AMD opencl-samples). It's quite old the
> > > >>> opencl-samples so, if you have any other suggestion for testing I'd be very
> > > >>> happy to test it as well.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> How to replicate the issue:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> # while true; do /usr/bin/MatrixMultiplication --device gpu \
> > > >>> --deviceId 0 -x 1000 -y 1000 -z 1000 -q -t -i 50; done
> > > >>> # while true; do clinfo; done
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Output:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> After a minute or less (sometimes could be more) I can see that
> > > >>> MatrixMultiplication and clinfo hang. In addition, with radeontop you can see
> > > >>> how the Graphics pipe goes from ~50% to 100%. Also the shader clocks
> > > >>> goes up from ~35% to ~96%.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> clinfo keeps printing:
> > > >>> ioctl(7, DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_WAIT, 0x7ffe46e5f950) = -1 ETIME (Timer expired)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> And MatrixMultiplication prints the following (strace) if you try to
> > > >>> kill the process:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> sched_yield() = 0
> > > >>> futex(0x557e945343b8, FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET_PRIVATE|FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME, 0,
> > > >>> NULL, FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANYstrace: Process 651 detached
> > > >>> <detached ...>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> After this, the gpu is not functional at all and you'd need a power cycle reset
> > > >>> to restore the system.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hardware info:
> > > >>> CPU: AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B with Radeon Vega Gfx (8) @ 2.000GHz
> > > >>> GPU: AMD ATI Radeon Vega Series / Radeon Vega Mobile Series
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> > > >>> [AMD/ATI] Raven Ridge [Radeon Vega Series / Radeon Vega Mobile Series]
> > > >>> (rev 83)
> > > >>> DeviceName: Broadcom 5762
> > > >>> Subsystem: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Raven Ridge
> > > >>> [Radeon Vega Series / Radeon Vega Mobile Series]
> > > >>> Kernel driver in use: amdgpu
> > > >>> Kernel modules: amdgpu
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Linux kernel info:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> root@qt5222:~# uname -a
> > > >>> Linux qt5222 5.11.0-rc6-qtec-standard #2 SMP Tue Feb 2 09:41:46 UTC
> > > >>> 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > > >>>
> > > >>> By enabling the kernel locks stats I could see the MatrixMultiplication is
> > > >>> hanged in the amdgpu_mn_invalidate_gfx function:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ 738.359202] 1 lock held by MatrixMultiplic/653:
> > > >>> [ 738.359206] #0: ffff88810e364fe0
> > > >>> (&adev->notifier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> > > >>> amdgpu_mn_invalidate_gfx+0x34/0xa0 [amdgpu]
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I can see in the the amdgpu_mn_invalidate_gfx function: the
> > > >>> dma_resv_wait_timeout_rcu uses wait_all (fences) and MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT so, I
> > > >>> guess the code gets stuck there waiting forever. According to the
> > > >>> documentation: "When somebody tries to invalidate the page tables we block the
> > > >>> update until all operations on the pages in question are completed, then those
> > > >>> pages are marked as accessed and also dirty if it wasn’t a read only access."
> > > >>> Looks like the fences are deadlocked and therefore, it never returns. Could it
> > > >>> be possible? any hint to where can I look to fix this?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thank you in advance.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Here the full dmesg output:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ 738.337726] INFO: task MatrixMultiplic:653 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
> > > >>> [ 738.344937] Not tainted 5.11.0-rc6-qtec-standard #2
> > > >>> [ 738.350384] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
> > > >>> disables this message.
> > > >>> [ 738.358240] task:MatrixMultiplic state:D stack: 0 pid: 653
> > > >>> ppid: 1 flags:0x00004000
> > > >>> [ 738.358254] Call Trace:
> > > >>> [ 738.358261] ? dma_fence_default_wait+0x1eb/0x230
> > > >>> [ 738.358276] __schedule+0x370/0x960
> > > >>> [ 738.358291] ? dma_fence_default_wait+0x117/0x230
> > > >>> [ 738.358297] ? dma_fence_default_wait+0x1eb/0x230
> > > >>> [ 738.358305] schedule+0x51/0xc0
> > > >>> [ 738.358312] schedule_timeout+0x275/0x380
> > > >>> [ 738.358324] ? dma_fence_default_wait+0x1eb/0x230
> > > >>> [ 738.358332] ? mark_held_locks+0x4f/0x70
> > > >>> [ 738.358341] ? dma_fence_default_wait+0x117/0x230
> > > >>> [ 738.358347] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180
> > > >>> [ 738.358353] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40
> > > >>> [ 738.358362] ? dma_fence_default_wait+0x117/0x230
> > > >>> [ 738.358370] ? dma_fence_default_wait+0x1eb/0x230
> > > >>> [ 738.358375] dma_fence_default_wait+0x214/0x230
> > > >>> [ 738.358384] ? dma_fence_release+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > > >>> [ 738.358396] dma_fence_wait_timeout+0x105/0x200
> > > >>> [ 738.358405] dma_resv_wait_timeout_rcu+0x1aa/0x5e0
> > > >>> [ 738.358421] amdgpu_mn_invalidate_gfx+0x55/0xa0 [amdgpu]
> > > >>> [ 738.358688] __mmu_notifier_release+0x1bb/0x210
> > > >>> [ 738.358710] exit_mmap+0x2f/0x1e0
> > > >>> [ 738.358723] ? find_held_lock+0x34/0xa0
> > > >>> [ 738.358746] mmput+0x39/0xe0
> > > >>> [ 738.358756] do_exit+0x5c3/0xc00
> > > >>> [ 738.358763] ? find_held_lock+0x34/0xa0
> > > >>> [ 738.358780] do_group_exit+0x47/0xb0
> > > >>> [ 738.358791] get_signal+0x15b/0xc50
> > > >>> [ 738.358807] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xaf/0x710
> > > >>> [ 738.358816] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd4/0x180
> > > >>> [ 738.358822] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40
> > > >>> [ 738.358831] ? ktime_get_mono_fast_ns+0x50/0xa0
> > > >>> [ 738.358844] ? amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x6b/0x80 [amdgpu]
> > > >>> [ 738.359044] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xf2/0x1b0
> > > >>> [ 738.359054] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x60
> > > >>> [ 738.359062] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > > >>> [ 738.359069] RIP: 0033:0x7f6b89a51887
> > > >>> [ 738.359076] RSP: 002b:00007f6b82b54b18 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
> > > >>> 0000000000000010
> > > >>> [ 738.359086] RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007f6b82b54b50 RCX: 00007f6b89a51887
> > > >>> [ 738.359091] RDX: 00007f6b82b54b50 RSI: 00000000c02064c3 RDI: 0000000000000007
> > > >>> [ 738.359096] RBP: 00000000c02064c3 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 00007f6b82b54bbc
> > > >>> [ 738.359101] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000165a0bc00
> > > >>> [ 738.359106] R13: 0000000000000007 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
> > > >>> [ 738.359129]
> > > >>> Showing all locks held in the system:
> > > >>> [ 738.359141] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/54:
> > > >>> [ 738.359148] #0: ffffffff829f6840 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at:
> > > >>> debug_show_all_locks+0x15/0x183
> > > >>> [ 738.359187] 1 lock held by systemd-journal/174:
> > > >>> [ 738.359202] 1 lock held by MatrixMultiplic/653:
> > > >>> [ 738.359206] #0: ffff88810e364fe0
> > > >>> (&adev->notifier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
> > > >>> amdgpu_mn_invalidate_gfx+0x34/0xa0 [amdgpu]
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Daniel
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> dri-devel mailing list
> > > >> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C81203e5bac5841b8e5a108d8c82087a9%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637479389339295622%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=RDSxD6OqD8HaOA2VnNfbJwLnKzhCLgOr5SVLjLF91bA%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch

Next message: Michael Ellerman: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/vdso: fix unnecessary rebuilds of vgettimeofday.o"
Previous message: Ionela Voinescu: "Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback"
In reply to: Daniel Gomez: "Re: [amdgpu] deadlock"
Next in thread: Christian König: "Re: [amdgpu] deadlock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]