On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 08:56:06PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
On 02/01/2021 06:43 PM, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:why make them special ? After all they are real registers and are only
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 08:55:59PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:I think there is no effect if have R26 and R27 in the list.
+++ b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.hhaveing this hole here make all code more complicated. Does it hurt
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
+#ifndef _ASM_MIPS_PERF_REGS_H
+#define _ASM_MIPS_PERF_REGS_H
+
+enum perf_event_mips_regs {
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_PC,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R1,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R2,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R3,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R4,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R5,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R6,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R7,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R8,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R9,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R10,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R11,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R12,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R13,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R14,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R15,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R16,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R17,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R18,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R19,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R20,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R21,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R22,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R23,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R24,
+ PERF_REG_MIPS_R25,
+ /*
+ * 26 and 27 are k0 and k1, they are always clobbered thus not
+ * stored.
+ */
to have R26 and R27 in the list ?
In the perf_reg_value(), PERF_REG_MIPS_R{26,27} are default case.
defined special by current ABIs.
Should I modify enum perf_event_mips_regs to add R26 and R27,yes please.
and then send v2?
Thomas.