Re: [PATCH] kernel: Expose SYS_kcmp by default
From: Lucas Stach
Date: Fri Feb 05 2021 - 14:46:34 EST
Am Freitag, dem 05.02.2021 um 16:37 +0000 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> Userspace has discovered the functionality offered by SYS_kcmp and has
> started to depend upon it. In particular, Mesa uses SYS_kcmp for
> os_same_file_description() in order to identify when two fd (e.g. device
> or dmabuf) point to the same struct file. Since they depend on it for
> core functionality, lift SYS_kcmp out of the non-default
> CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE into the selectable syscall category.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> init/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
> kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index b77c60f8b963..f62fca13ac5b 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1194,6 +1194,7 @@ endif # NAMESPACES
> config CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
> bool "Checkpoint/restore support"
> select PROC_CHILDREN
> + select KCMP
> default n
> help
> Enables additional kernel features in a sake of checkpoint/restore.
> @@ -1737,6 +1738,16 @@ config ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_CALLBACKS
> config ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE
> bool
>
>
>
>
> +config KCMP
> + bool "Enable kcmp() system call" if EXPERT
> + default y
> + help
> + Enable the file descriptor comparison system call. It provides
> + user-space with the ability to compare two fd to see if they
> + point to the same file, and check other attributes.
This description undersells the abilities of kcmp, while fd compare is
the only thing used by the graphics stack, kcmp can compare a handful
of other system resources, see man 2 kcmp. I think the helptext should
at least try to cover this fact somewhat.
Regards,
Lucas
> +
> + If unsure, say Y.
> +
> config RSEQ
> bool "Enable rseq() system call" if EXPERT
> default y
> diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
> index aa7368c7eabf..320f1f3941b7 100644
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ obj-y += livepatch/
> obj-y += dma/
> obj-y += entry/
>
>
>
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) += kcmp.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_KCMP) += kcmp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FREEZER) += freezer.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILING) += profile.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> index 26c72f2b61b1..1b6c7d33c4ff 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ TEST(kcmp)
> ret = __filecmp(getpid(), getpid(), 1, 1);
> EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0);
> if (ret != 0 && errno == ENOSYS)
> - SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support kcmp() (missing CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE?)");
> + SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support kcmp() (missing CONFIG_KCMP?)");
> }
>
>
>
>
> TEST(mode_strict_support)