[PATCH 4.19 10/17] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Dont block target in failfast state

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 72eeb7c7151302ef007f1acd018cbf6f30e50321 ]

If the port is in SRP_RPORT_FAIL_FAST state when srp_reconnect_rport() is
entered, a transition to SDEV_BLOCK would be illegal, and a kernel WARNING
would be triggered. Skip scsi_target_block() in this case.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210111142541.21534-1-mwilck@xxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
index 4e46fdb2d7c99..2aaf1b7103981 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
@@ -555,7 +555,14 @@ int srp_reconnect_rport(struct srp_rport *rport)
 	res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rport->mutex);
 	if (res)
 		goto out;
-	scsi_target_block(&shost->shost_gendev);
+	if (rport->state != SRP_RPORT_FAIL_FAST)
+		/*
+		 * sdev state must be SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE, transition
+		 * to SDEV_BLOCK is illegal. Calling scsi_target_unblock()
+		 * later is ok though, scsi_internal_device_unblock_nowait()
+		 * treats SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE like SDEV_BLOCK.
+		 */
+		scsi_target_block(&shost->shost_gendev);
 	res = rport->state != SRP_RPORT_LOST ? i->f->reconnect(rport) : -ENODEV;
 	pr_debug("%s (state %d): transport.reconnect() returned %d\n",
 		 dev_name(&shost->shost_gendev), rport->state, res);
-- 
2.27.0