Re: [RFC v1 09/26] x86/tdx: Handle CPUID via #VE

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:42:01PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:39 PM Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > TDX has three classes of CPUID leaves: some CPUID leaves
> > are always handled by the CPU, others are handled by the TDX module,
> > and some others are handled by the VMM. Since the VMM cannot directly
> > intercept the instruction these are reflected with a #VE exception
> > to the guest, which then converts it into a TDCALL to the VMM,
> > or handled directly.
> >
> > The TDX module EAS has a full list of CPUID leaves which are handled
> > natively or by the TDX module in 16.2. Only unknown CPUIDs are handled by
> > the #VE method. In practice this typically only applies to the
> > hypervisor specific CPUIDs unknown to the native CPU.
> >
> > Therefore there is no risk of causing this in early CPUID code which
> > runs before the #VE handler is set up because it will never access
> > those exotic CPUID leaves.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
> > index 5d961263601e..e98058c048b5 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
> > @@ -172,6 +172,35 @@ static int tdx_write_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, unsigned int low,
> >         return ret || r10 ? -EIO : 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void tdx_handle_cpuid(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +       register long r10 asm("r10") = TDVMCALL_STANDARD;
> > +       register long r11 asm("r11") = EXIT_REASON_CPUID;
> > +       register long r12 asm("r12") = regs->ax;
> > +       register long r13 asm("r13") = regs->cx;
> > +       register long r14 asm("r14");
> > +       register long r15 asm("r15");
> > +       register long rcx asm("rcx");
> > +       long ret;
> > +
> > +       /* Allow to pass R10, R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15 down to the VMM */
> > +       rcx = BIT(10) | BIT(11) | BIT(12) | BIT(13) | BIT(14) | BIT(15);
> > +
> > +       asm volatile(TDCALL
> > +                       : "=a"(ret), "=r"(r10), "=r"(r11), "=r"(r12), "=r"(r13),
> > +                         "=r"(r14), "=r"(r15)
> > +                       : "a"(TDVMCALL), "r"(rcx), "r"(r10), "r"(r11), "r"(r12),
> > +                         "r"(r13)
> > +                       : );
> 
> Some "+" constraints would make this simpler.  But I think you should
> factor the TDCALL helper out into its own function.

Factor out TDCALL into a helper is tricky: different TDCALLs have
different list of registers passed to VMM.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov