Re: [PATCH 05/18] tty: serial: samsung_tty: add support for Apple UARTs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 06:26:43PM +0900, Hector Martin 'marcan' wrote:
> On 07/02/2021 18.12, Hector Martin 'marcan' wrote:
> > On 06/02/2021 22.15, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > The default should be IRQ_NONE, otherwise the kernel cannot detect a
> > > screaming spurious interrupt.
> > 
> > Good point, and this needs fixing in s3c64xx_serial_handle_irq too then
> > (which is what I based mine off of).
> > 
> > > > +	ret = request_irq(port->irq, apple_serial_handle_irq, IRQF_SHARED,
> > > > +			  s3c24xx_serial_portname(port), ourport);
> > > 
> > > Why IRQF_SHARED? Do you expect any other device sharing the same line
> > > with this UART?
> > 
> > This also came from s3c64xx_serial_startup and... now I wonder why that
> > one needs it. Maybe on some SoCs it does get shared? Certainly not for
> > discrete rx/tx irq chips (and indeed those don't set the flag)...
> > 
> > CCing Thomas, who added the S3C64xx support (and should probably review
> > this patch); is there a reason for IRQF_SHARED there? NB: v1 breaks the
> > build on arm or with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, those will be fixed for v2.
> 
> Seems Thomas does not work for Linaro any more :)
> 
> CCing Krzysztof instead, who is the Samsung arch maintainer.

Please use the scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get the list of people to
Cc. The script would point necessary folks.

A different issue is that all your emails from this thread were marked
by Google as spam.  I don't see any particular warning signs in the
header so it looks more of content-based match for spam.

> > Either way, certainly not for Apple SoCs; I'll get rid of IRQF_SHARED
> > for v2.

Please send a v2 after fixing issues pointed out by kbuild.

Best regards,
Krzysztof