[PATCH 4.9 09/43] futex: Provide and use pi_state_update_owner()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit c5cade200ab9a2a3be9e7f32a752c8d86b502ec7 ]

Updating pi_state::owner is done at several places with the same
code. Provide a function for it and use that at the obvious places.

This is also a preparation for a bug fix to avoid yet another copy of the
same code or alternatively introducing a completely unpenetratable mess of
gotos.

Originally-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/futex.c |   64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -837,6 +837,29 @@ static struct futex_pi_state * alloc_pi_
 	return pi_state;
 }
 
+static void pi_state_update_owner(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state,
+				  struct task_struct *new_owner)
+{
+	struct task_struct *old_owner = pi_state->owner;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
+
+	if (old_owner) {
+		raw_spin_lock(&old_owner->pi_lock);
+		WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list));
+		list_del_init(&pi_state->list);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&old_owner->pi_lock);
+	}
+
+	if (new_owner) {
+		raw_spin_lock(&new_owner->pi_lock);
+		WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list));
+		list_add(&pi_state->list, &new_owner->pi_state_list);
+		pi_state->owner = new_owner;
+		raw_spin_unlock(&new_owner->pi_lock);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Drops a reference to the pi_state object and frees or caches it
  * when the last reference is gone.
@@ -1432,26 +1455,16 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
 		else
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 	}
-	if (ret) {
-		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	raw_spin_lock(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock);
-	WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list));
-	list_del_init(&pi_state->list);
-	raw_spin_unlock(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock);
 
-	raw_spin_lock(&new_owner->pi_lock);
-	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list));
-	list_add(&pi_state->list, &new_owner->pi_state_list);
-	pi_state->owner = new_owner;
-	raw_spin_unlock(&new_owner->pi_lock);
-
-	/*
-	 * We've updated the uservalue, this unlock cannot fail.
-	 */
-	deboost = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q);
+	if (!ret) {
+		/*
+		 * This is a point of no return; once we modified the uval
+		 * there is no going back and subsequent operations must
+		 * not fail.
+		 */
+		pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, new_owner);
+		deboost = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q);
+	}
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
@@ -2353,19 +2366,8 @@ retry:
 	 * We fixed up user space. Now we need to fix the pi_state
 	 * itself.
 	 */
-	if (pi_state->owner != NULL) {
-		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock);
-		WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list));
-		list_del_init(&pi_state->list);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock);
-	}
-
-	pi_state->owner = newowner;
+	pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, newowner);
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&newowner->pi_lock);
-	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list));
-	list_add(&pi_state->list, &newowner->pi_state_list);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&newowner->pi_lock);
 	return 0;
 
 	/*