Re: [PATCH 05/18] tty: serial: samsung_tty: add support for Apple UARTs

[Hector Martin]

On 08/02/2021 19.34, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2021-02-07 09:12, Hector Martin 'marcan' wrote:
> > On 06/02/2021 22.15, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > Do you actually need a new port type here? Looking at the driver
> > > itself, it is mainly used to work out the IRQ model. Maybe introducing
> > > a new irq_type field in the port structure would be better than
> > > exposing this to userspace (which should see something that is exactly
> > > the same as a S3C UART).
> >
> > Well... every S3C variant already has its own port type here.
> >
> > #define PORT_S3C2410    55
> > #define PORT_S3C2440    61
> > #define PORT_S3C2400    67
> > #define PORT_S3C2412    73
> > #define PORT_S3C6400    84
> >
> > If we don't introduce a new one, which one should we pretend to be? :)
>
> Pick one! :D

*queries /dev/urandom* :-)

> > I agree that it might make sense to merge all of these into one,
> > though; I don't know what the original reason for splitting them out
> > is. But now that they're part of the userspace API, this might not be
> > a good idea. Though, unsurprisingly, some googling suggests there are
> > zero users of these defines in userspace.
>
> I don't think we can do that, but I don't think we should keep adding
> to this unless there is a very good reason. Greg would know, I expect.

Greg, what do you think? Add more PORT_ UART types for Samsung variants, 
or overload one of the existing ones and deal with it in the driver?

--
Hector Martin (marcan@xxxxxxxxx)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub