Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm, slub: don't combine pr_err with INFO

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 06:14:38PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> It is strange to combine "pr_err" with "INFO", so let's remove the
> prefix completely.

So is this the right thing to do?  Should it be pr_info() instead?
Many of these messages do not appear to be error messages, but
rather informational messages.