Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: do not assume PTE is writable after follow_pfn

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:02:59PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 02:51:33PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:14:11PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > 
> > > But I do have a question on why dax as the only user needs to pass in the
> > > notifier to follow_pte() for initialization.
> > 
> > Not sure either, why does DAX opencode something very much like
> > page_mkclean() with dax_entry_mkclean()?
> > 
> > Also it looks like DAX uses the wrong notifier, it calls
> > MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR but page_mkclean_one() uses
> > MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_PAGE for the same PTE modification sequence??
> > 
> > page_mkclean() has some technique to make the notifier have the right
> > size without becoming entangled in the PTL locks..
> 
> Right.  I guess it's because dax doesn't have "struct page*" on the
> back, so it

It doesn't? I thought DAX cases did?

Jason