Re: [PATCH 2/3] mailbox: sprd: Add supplementary inbox support

From: Orson Zhai
Date: Mon Feb 08 2021 - 23:36:13 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH 22/49] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Alder Lake support"
Previous message: Randy Dunlap: "Re: mmotm 2021-02-08-15-44 uploaded (mm-cma-print-region-name-on-failure.patch)"
In reply to: Baolin Wang: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] mailbox: sprd: Add supplementary inbox support"
Next in thread: Baolin Wang: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] mailbox: sprd: Add supplementary inbox support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:27:47PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:52 PM Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Some sensors connected to Unisoc mailbox will send data very frequently.
> > This makes channel 0 very busy and the messages from other remote cores
> > not able to be handled as soon as possible.
> >
> > Then a supplementary inbox is added to the host core side for transferring
> > mass but not emergency messages from the remote cores, such as step
> > counting sensor, with an independent FIFO and interrupt.
>
> So this is another part of the mailbox hardware, containing a batch of
> hardware channels?

No. Actually it is an inbox assigned to one of the remote cores before but
being exposed to host cpu core for now.

> I did not see it before, its function is similar
> with inbox/outbox?

Exactly same with any other channel.
But only the part of outbox is exposed to host side. Inbox part of this channel
is still kept for original remote core to use.

It's a trick (un-documented) from our ASIC designers to resolve some special requirements.
I was also shocked when hearing it :)

I guess other vendors will add another mailbox module to resovle this, but our guys might
consider the hardware cost...

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mailbox/sprd-mailbox.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/sprd-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/sprd-mailbox.c
> > index e606f52..74648db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/sprd-mailbox.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/sprd-mailbox.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> >
> > @@ -50,13 +51,17 @@
> > #define SPRD_OUTBOX_FIFO_NOT_EMPTY_IRQ BIT(0)
> > #define SPRD_OUTBOX_FIFO_IRQ_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
> >
> > +#define SPRD_OUTBOX_BASE_SPAN 0x1000
> > #define SPRD_MBOX_CHAN_MAX 8
> > +#define SPRD_SUPP_INBOX_ID_SC9860 6
> >
> > struct sprd_mbox_priv {
> > struct mbox_controller mbox;
> > struct device *dev;
> > void __iomem *inbox_base;
> > void __iomem *outbox_base;
> > + /* Base register address for supplementary outbox */
> > + void __iomem *supp_base;
> > struct clk *clk;
> > u32 outbox_fifo_depth;
> >
> > @@ -96,14 +101,13 @@ static u32 sprd_mbox_get_fifo_len(struct sprd_mbox_priv *priv, u32 fifo_sts)
> > return fifo_len;
> > }
> >
> > -static irqreturn_t sprd_mbox_outbox_isr(int irq, void *data)
> > +static inline irqreturn_t do_outbox_isr(void __iomem *base, struct sprd_mbox_priv *priv)
>
> No need to add an explicit 'inline' tag, the compiler can do the smart
> things than us.

I thought it will help to increase perfermance of isr execution before.

Will fix at next.

>
> > {
> > - struct sprd_mbox_priv *priv = data;
> > struct mbox_chan *chan;
> > u32 fifo_sts, fifo_len, msg[2];
> > int i, id;
> >
> > - fifo_sts = readl(priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_FIFO_STS);
> > + fifo_sts = readl(base + SPRD_MBOX_FIFO_STS);
> >
> > fifo_len = sprd_mbox_get_fifo_len(priv, fifo_sts);
> > if (!fifo_len) {
> > @@ -112,23 +116,41 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_mbox_outbox_isr(int irq, void *data)
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < fifo_len; i++) {
> > - msg[0] = readl(priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_MSG_LOW);
> > - msg[1] = readl(priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_MSG_HIGH);
> > - id = readl(priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_ID);
> > + msg[0] = readl(base + SPRD_MBOX_MSG_LOW);
> > + msg[1] = readl(base + SPRD_MBOX_MSG_HIGH);
> > + id = readl(base + SPRD_MBOX_ID);
> >
> > chan = &priv->chan[id];
> > - mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)msg);
> > + if (chan->cl)
> > + mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)msg);
> > + else
> > + dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev,
> > + "message's been dropped at ch[%d]\n", id);
> >
> > /* Trigger to update outbox FIFO pointer */
> > - writel(0x1, priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_TRIGGER);
> > + writel(0x1, base + SPRD_MBOX_TRIGGER);
> > }
> >
> > /* Clear irq status after reading all message. */
> > - writel(SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_CLR, priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_STS);
> > + writel(SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_CLR, base + SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_STS);
> >
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > +static irqreturn_t sprd_mbox_outbox_isr(int irq, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct sprd_mbox_priv *priv = data;
> > +
> > + return do_outbox_isr(priv->outbox_base, priv);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t sprd_mbox_supp_isr(int irq, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct sprd_mbox_priv *priv = data;
> > +
> > + return do_outbox_isr(priv->supp_base, priv);
> > +}
> > +
> > static irqreturn_t sprd_mbox_inbox_isr(int irq, void *data)
> > {
> > struct sprd_mbox_priv *priv = data;
> > @@ -231,6 +253,14 @@ static int sprd_mbox_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> > val = readl(priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_MSK);
> > val &= ~SPRD_OUTBOX_FIFO_NOT_EMPTY_IRQ;
> > writel(val, priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_MSK);
> > +
> > + /* Enable supplementary outbox as the fundamental one */
> > + if (priv->supp_base) {
> > + writel(0x0, priv->supp_base + SPRD_MBOX_FIFO_RST);
> > + val = readl(priv->supp_base + SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_MSK);
> > + val &= ~SPRD_OUTBOX_FIFO_NOT_EMPTY_IRQ;
> > + writel(val, priv->supp_base + SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_MSK);
> > + }
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> >
> > @@ -246,6 +276,10 @@ static void sprd_mbox_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> > /* Disable inbox & outbox interrupt */
> > writel(SPRD_INBOX_FIFO_IRQ_MASK, priv->inbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_MSK);
> > writel(SPRD_OUTBOX_FIFO_IRQ_MASK, priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_MSK);
> > +
> > + if (priv->supp_base)
> > + writel(SPRD_OUTBOX_FIFO_IRQ_MASK,
> > + priv->supp_base + SPRD_MBOX_IRQ_MSK);
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > }
> > @@ -268,8 +302,8 @@ static int sprd_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct sprd_mbox_priv *priv;
> > - int ret, inbox_irq, outbox_irq;
> > - unsigned long id;
> > + int ret, inbox_irq, outbox_irq, supp_irq;
> > + unsigned long id, supp;
> >
> > priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!priv)
> > @@ -280,11 +314,15 @@ static int sprd_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > mutex_init(&priv->lock);
> >
> > /*
> > - * The Spreadtrum mailbox uses an inbox to send messages to the target
> > - * core, and uses an outbox to receive messages from other cores.
> > + * Unisoc mailbox uses an inbox to send messages to the target
> > + * core, and uses (an) outbox(es) to receive messages from other
> > + * cores.
> > + *
> > + * Thus in general the mailbox controller supplies 2 different
> > + * register addresses and IRQ numbers for inbox and outbox.
> > *
> > - * Thus the mailbox controller supplies 2 different register addresses
> > - * and IRQ numbers for inbox and outbox.
> > + * If necessary, a supplementary inbox could be enabled optionally
> > + * with an independent FIFO and an extra interrupt.
> > */
> > priv->inbox_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->inbox_base))
> > @@ -310,7 +348,7 @@ static int sprd_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - inbox_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + inbox_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "inbox");
>
> I think you should put the dt changes before this patch.

OK.

Thanks,
Orson
>
> > if (inbox_irq < 0)
> > return inbox_irq;
> >
> > @@ -321,7 +359,7 @@ static int sprd_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - outbox_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> > + outbox_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "outbox");
> > if (outbox_irq < 0)
> > return outbox_irq;
> >
> > @@ -332,6 +370,24 @@ static int sprd_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Supplementary outbox IRQ is optional */
> > + supp_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "supp-outbox");
> > + if (supp_irq > 0) {
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, supp_irq, sprd_mbox_supp_isr,
> > + IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(dev), priv);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to request outbox IRQ: %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + supp = (unsigned long) of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > + if (!supp) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "no supplementary outbox specified\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > + priv->supp_base = priv->outbox_base + (SPRD_OUTBOX_BASE_SPAN * supp);
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Get the default outbox FIFO depth */
> > priv->outbox_fifo_depth =
> > readl(priv->outbox_base + SPRD_MBOX_FIFO_DEPTH) + 1;
> > @@ -354,7 +410,8 @@ static int sprd_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id sprd_mbox_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "sprd,sc9860-mailbox", },
> > + { .compatible = "sprd,sc9860-mailbox",
> > + .data = (void *)SPRD_SUPP_INBOX_ID_SC9860 },
> > { },
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sprd_mbox_of_match);
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
>
>
> --
> Baolin Wang

Next message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH 22/49] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Alder Lake support"
Previous message: Randy Dunlap: "Re: mmotm 2021-02-08-15-44 uploaded (mm-cma-print-region-name-on-failure.patch)"
In reply to: Baolin Wang: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] mailbox: sprd: Add supplementary inbox support"
Next in thread: Baolin Wang: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] mailbox: sprd: Add supplementary inbox support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]