Re: [PATCH v5 17/22] powerpc/syscall: Do not check unsupported scv vector on PPC32
From: Nicholas Piggin
Date: Tue Feb 09 2021 - 02:57:32 EST
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 9, 2021 4:13 pm:
>
>
> Le 09/02/2021 à 03:00, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 9, 2021 1:10 am:
>>> Only PPC64 has scv. No need to check the 0x7ff0 trap on PPC32.
>>> For that, add a helper trap_is_unsupported_scv() similar to
>>> trap_is_scv().
>>>
>>> And ignore the scv parameter in syscall_exit_prepare (Save 14 cycles
>>> 346 => 332 cycles)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v5: Added a helper trap_is_unsupported_scv()
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h | 5 +++++
>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S | 1 -
>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c | 7 +++++--
>>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> index 58f9dc060a7b..2c842b11a924 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> @@ -229,6 +229,11 @@ static inline bool trap_is_scv(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) && TRAP(regs) == 0x3000);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline bool trap_is_unsupported_scv(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> + return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) && TRAP(regs) == 0x7ff0);
>>> +}
>>
>> This change is good.
>>
>>> +
>>> static inline bool trap_is_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> {
>>> return (trap_is_scv(regs) || TRAP(regs) == 0xc00);
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>>> index cffe58e63356..7c824e8928d0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>>> @@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ transfer_to_syscall:
>>>
>>> ret_from_syscall:
>>> addi r4,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
>>> - li r5,0
>>> bl syscall_exit_prepare
>>
>> For this one, I think it would be nice to do the "right" thing and make
>> the function prototypes different on !64S. They could then declare a
>> local const bool scv = 0.
>>
>> We could have syscall_exit_prepare and syscall_exit_prepare_maybe_scv
>> or something like that, 64s can use the latter one and the former can be
>> a wrapper that passes constant 0 for scv. Then we don't have different
>> prototypes for the same function, but you just have to make the 32-bit
>> version static inline and the 64-bit version exported to asm.
>
> You can't call a static inline function from ASM, I don't understand you.
I mean
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
notrace unsigned long syscall_exit_prepare_scv(unsigned long r3,
struct pt_regs *regs,
long scv)
#else
static inline long syscall_exit_prepare_scv(unsigned long r3,
struct pt_regs *regs,
long scv)
#endif
#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
notrace unsigned long syscall_exit_prepare(unsigned long r3,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return syscall_exit_prepare_scv(r3, regs, 0);
}
#endif
>
> What is wrong for you really here ? Is that the fact we leave scv random, or is that the below
> IS_ENABLED() ?
That scv arg is random. I know generated code essentially would be no
different and no possibility of tracing, but would just prefer to call
the C "correctly" if possible.
> I don't mind keeping the 'li r5,0' before calling the function if you find it cleaner, the real
> performance gain is with setting scv to 0 below for PPC32 (and maybe it should be set to zero for
> book3e/64 too ?).
Yes 64e would like this optimisation.
Thanks,
Nick