Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 8:48 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:30 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, February 5, 2021 12:15:22 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, February 5, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > >> failed like this:
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Rafael, maybe I was unclear when explaining to you the dependencies with the series of series, but all three parts should go ordered. In any case it’s easy to fix. I will send you a PR late today of the immutable tag (part 1) that needs to be included in order to avoid the above.
> > > >
> > > > PR had just been sent to linux-acpi@ and Rafael in Cc.
> > >
> > > I haven't seen that PR, though, in any of my inboxes etc.
> > >
> > > Can you please point me to an archive or similar where I can find it?
> >
> > Sure, lore has it
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/YB0mPPgpIpQzhNXS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
>
> If it is possible, please pull that PR and on top of that (re-)apply
> the MFD related series.

Done (merged into the bleeding-edge branch).

I was confused by it apparently asking Linus to pull. :-)