Re: [RESEND PATCH v18 0/3] userspace MHI client interface driver

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:20:30 +0100 Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> This may be a stupid suggestion, but would the integration look less a
> backdoor if it would have been named "mhi_wwan" and it exposed already
> all the AT+DIAG+QMI+MBIM+NMEA possible channels as chardevs, not just
> QMI?

What's DIAG? Who's going to remember that this is a backdoor driver 
a year from now when Qualcomm sends a one liner patches which just 
adds a single ID to open another channel?