Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Move reserved-memory to devices

From: Doug Anderson
Date: Tue Feb 09 2021 - 20:38:16 EST


Hi,

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:09 AM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
> index 216a74f0057c..2f44785d1af0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
> @@ -153,36 +153,66 @@ panel_in_edp: endpoint {
> * all modifications to the memory map (from sdm845.dtsi) in one place.
> */
>
> -/*
> - * Our mpss_region is 8MB bigger than the default one and that conflicts
> - * with venus_mem and cdsp_mem.
> - *
> - * For venus_mem we'll delete and re-create at a different address.
> - *
> - * cdsp_mem isn't used on cheza right now so we won't bother re-creating it; but
> - * that also means we need to delete cdsp_pas.
> - */
> -/delete-node/ &venus_mem;
> -/delete-node/ &cdsp_mem;
> -/delete-node/ &cdsp_pas;

Note to self: on cheza we'll end up with "cdsp_pas" existing now, but
that _should_ be OK since it's disabled


> @@ -1321,6 +1359,7 @@ config {
> };
>
> &venus {
> + memory-region = <&venus_mem>;
> video-firmware {
> iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x10b2 0x0>;
> };

slight nit: I think it looks ugly not to have a blank line between the
property and the sub-node. ;-)


> @@ -766,8 +697,6 @@ adsp_pas: remoteproc-adsp {
> clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> clock-names = "xo";
>
> - memory-region = <&adsp_mem>;
> -

Note to self: we're losing the above on cheza, but that _should_ be OK
since the node is disabled anyway.

Probably not critical at this point, but it makes me wonder whether we
could remove adsp_mem on cheza...

---

So I only looked at the cheza and sdm845 changes and they look fine to
me and this seems like a good change overall. I'm assuming that folks
who focus on the other boards will double-check your work there if
they care or just trust that everything is great. ;-)

OK, I lied. I took a quick glance. In "sdm845-db845c" you maybe miss
adding the "memory-region" back to the WiFi? Have you tried running
something like this before/after:

for f in sdm845*.dtb; do dtc -I dtb -O dts --sort $f > $f.dts; done

You've gotta ignore phandle ID differences but otherwise it'll point
out things like this.


-Doug