Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Add roundrobin raid1 read policy

From: Anand Jain
Date: Wed Feb 10 2021 - 01:53:30 EST


On 10/02/2021 04:30, Michal Rostecki wrote:
From: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@xxxxxxxx>

This patch series adds a new raid1 read policy - roundrobin. For each
request, it selects the mirror which has lower load than queue depth.
Load is defined as the number of inflight requests + a penalty value
(if the scheduled request is not local to the last processed request for
a rotational disk).

The series consists of preparational changes which add necessary
information to the btrfs_device struct and the change with the policy.

This policy was tested with fio and compared with the default `pid`
policy.

The singlethreaded test has the following parameters:

[global]
name=btrfs-raid1-seqread
filename=btrfs-raid1-seqread
rw=read
bs=64k
direct=0
numjobs=1
time_based=0

[file1]
size=10G
ioengine=libaio

and shows the following results:

- raid1c3 with 3 HDDs:
3 x Segate Barracuda ST2000DM008 (2TB)
* pid policy
READ: bw=217MiB/s (228MB/s), 217MiB/s-217MiB/s (228MB/s-228MB/s),
io=10.0GiB (10.7GB), run=47082-47082msec
* roundrobin policy
READ: bw=409MiB/s (429MB/s), 409MiB/s-409MiB/s (429MB/s-429MB/s),
io=10.0GiB (10.7GB), run=25028-25028mse


- raid1c3 with 2 HDDs and 1 SSD:
2 x Segate Barracuda ST2000DM008 (2TB)
1 x Crucial CT256M550SSD1 (256GB)
* pid policy (the worst case when only HDDs were chosen)
READ: bw=220MiB/s (231MB/s), 220MiB/s-220MiB/s (231MB/s-231MB/s),
io=10.0GiB (10.7GB), run=46577-46577mse
* pid policy (the best case when SSD was used as well)
READ: bw=513MiB/s (538MB/s), 513MiB/s-513MiB/s (538MB/s-538MB/s),
io=10.0GiB (10.7GB), run=19954-19954msec
* roundrobin (there are no noticeable differences when testing multiple
times)
READ: bw=541MiB/s (567MB/s), 541MiB/s-541MiB/s (567MB/s-567MB/s),
io=10.0GiB (10.7GB), run=18933-18933msec

The multithreaded test has the following parameters:

[global]
name=btrfs-raid1-seqread
filename=btrfs-raid1-seqread
rw=read
bs=64k
direct=0
numjobs=8
time_based=0

[file1]
size=10G
ioengine=libaio

and shows the following results:

- raid1c3 with 3 HDDs: 3 x Segate Barracuda ST2000DM008 (2TB)
3 x Segate Barracuda ST2000DM008 (2TB)
* pid policy
READ: bw=1569MiB/s (1645MB/s), 196MiB/s-196MiB/s (206MB/s-206MB/s),
io=80.0GiB (85.9GB), run=52210-52211msec
* roundrobin
READ: bw=1733MiB/s (1817MB/s), 217MiB/s-217MiB/s (227MB/s-227MB/s),
io=80.0GiB (85.9GB), run=47269-47271msec
- raid1c3 with 2 HDDs and 1 SSD:
2 x Segate Barracuda ST2000DM008 (2TB)
1 x Crucial CT256M550SSD1 (256GB)
* pid policy
READ: bw=1843MiB/s (1932MB/s), 230MiB/s-230MiB/s (242MB/s-242MB/s),
io=80.0GiB (85.9GB), run=44449-44450msec
* roundrobin
READ: bw=2485MiB/s (2605MB/s), 311MiB/s-311MiB/s (326MB/s-326MB/s),
io=80.0GiB (85.9GB), run=32969-32970msec


Both of the above test cases are sequential. How about some random IO
workload?

Also, the seek time for non-rotational devices does not exist. So it is
a good idea to test with ssd + nvme and all nvme or all ssd.

To measure the performance of each policy and find optimal penalty
values, I created scripts which are available here:

https://gitlab.com/vadorovsky/btrfs-perf
https://github.com/mrostecki/btrfs-perf

Michal Rostecki (6):


btrfs: Add inflight BIO request counter
btrfs: Store the last device I/O offset

These patches look good. But as only round-robin policy requires
to monitor the inflight and last-offset. Could you bring them under
if policy=roundrobin? Otherwise, it is just a waste of CPU cycles
if the policy != roundrobin.

> btrfs: Add stripe_physical function
> btrfs: Check if the filesystem is has mixed type of devices

Thanks, Anand

btrfs: sysfs: Add directory for read policies
btrfs: Add roundrobin raid1 read policy

fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 3 +
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 3 +
fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 22 +++++
5 files changed, 366 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)