Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem

[Bjorn Helgaas]

I see I already acked this, but if you haven't merged it yet there are
a few typos in the commit log:

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:58:31PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Since 3234ac664a87 ("/dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims
> the region") /dev/kmem zaps ptes when the kernel requests exclusive
> acccess to an iomem region. And with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM, this is
> the default for all driver uses.

s/ptes/PTEs/

> Except there's two more ways to access PCI BARs: sysfs and proc mmap
> support. Let's plug that hole.

s/there's two/there are two/

> For revoke_devmem() to work we need to link our vma into the same
> address_space, with consistent vma->vm_pgoff. ->pgoff is already
> adjusted, because that's how (io_)remap_pfn_range works, but for the
> mapping we need to adjust vma->vm_file->f_mapping. The cleanest way is
> to adjust this at at ->open time:
> 
> - for sysfs this is easy, now that binary attributes support this. We
>   just set bin_attr->mapping when mmap is supported
> - for procfs it's a bit more tricky, since procfs pci access has only
>   one file per device, and access to a specific resources first needs
>   to be set up with some ioctl calls. But mmap is only supported for
>   the same resources as sysfs exposes with mmap support, and otherwise
>   rejected, so we can set the mapping unconditionally at open time
>   without harm.

s/pci access/PCI access/
s/a specific resources/a specific resource/

> A special consideration is for arch_can_pci_mmap_io() - we need to
> make sure that the ->f_mapping doesn't alias between ioport and iomem
> space. There's only 2 ways in-tree to support mmap of ioports: generic
> pci mmap (ARCH_GENERIC_PCI_MMAP_RESOURCE), and sparc as the single
> architecture hand-rolling. Both approach support ioport mmap through a
> special pfn range and not through magic pte attributes. Aliasing is
> therefore not a problem.

s/There's only 2/There are only two/
s/pci mmap/PCI mmap/
s/Both approach/Both approaches/
s/pfn/PFN/
s/pte/PTE/

> The only difference in access checks left is that sysfs PCI mmap does
> not check for CAP_RAWIO. I'm not really sure whether that should be
> added or not.
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 4 ++++
>  drivers/pci/proc.c      | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index 0c45b4f7b214..f8afd54ca3e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>  	b->legacy_io->read = pci_read_legacy_io;
>  	b->legacy_io->write = pci_write_legacy_io;
>  	b->legacy_io->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_io;
> +	b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_io);
>  	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_io);
>  	if (error)
> @@ -954,6 +955,7 @@ void pci_create_legacy_files(struct pci_bus *b)
>  	b->legacy_mem->size = 1024*1024;
>  	b->legacy_mem->attr.mode = 0600;
>  	b->legacy_mem->mmap = pci_mmap_legacy_mem;
> +	b->legacy_io->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	pci_adjust_legacy_attr(b, pci_mmap_mem);
>  	error = device_create_bin_file(&b->dev, b->legacy_mem);
>  	if (error)
> @@ -1169,6 +1171,8 @@ static int pci_create_attr(struct pci_dev *pdev, int num, int write_combine)
>  			res_attr->mmap = pci_mmap_resource_uc;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	if (res_attr->mmap)
> +		res_attr->mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  	res_attr->attr.name = res_attr_name;
>  	res_attr->attr.mode = 0600;
>  	res_attr->size = pci_resource_len(pdev, num);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/proc.c b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> index 3a2f90beb4cb..9bab07302bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/proc.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ static int proc_bus_pci_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	fpriv->write_combine = 0;
>  
>  	file->private_data = fpriv;
> +	file->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel