Re: [PATCH] locking/arch: Move qrwlock.h include after qspinlock.h

[Thomas Bogendoerfer]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:59:35PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/02/21 17:19, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > >   arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h  | 2 +-
> > >   arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h   | 2 +-
> > >   arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 +-
> > >   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > which tree should this go through ? I can take it via mips-next,
> > if everybody agrees.
> 
> The breakage is in the KVM tree, and the existing patch has acked-by from
> the locking primitives folks.  So I'll queue it there in order to limit the
> range that breaks bisection.

if it's not too late you can add by 

Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]