Re: [PATCH] staging: wimax/i2400m: fix some byte order issues found by sparse

[Anirudh Rayabharam]

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:43:10PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:00:25PM +0530, Anirudh Rayabharam wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:35:27PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:59:08AM +0530, Anirudh Rayabharam wrote:
> > > > Fix sparse byte-order warnings in the i2400m_bm_cmd_prepare()
> > > > function:
> > > > 
> > > > wimax/i2400m/fw.c:194:36: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
> > > > wimax/i2400m/fw.c:195:34: warning: invalid assignment: +=
> > > > wimax/i2400m/fw.c:195:34:    left side has type unsigned int
> > > > wimax/i2400m/fw.c:195:34:    right side has type restricted __le32
> > > > wimax/i2400m/fw.c:196:32: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
> > > > wimax/i2400m/fw.c:196:47: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
> > > > wimax/i2400m/fw.c:196:66: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/fw.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/fw.c b/drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
> > > > index b2fd4bd2c5f9..bce651a6b543 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
> > > > @@ -189,12 +189,16 @@ void i2400m_bm_cmd_prepare(struct i2400m_bootrom_header *cmd)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	if (i2400m_brh_get_use_checksum(cmd)) {
> > > >  		int i;
> > > > -		u32 checksum = 0;
> > > > +		__le32 checksum = 0;
> > > 
> > > __le32 is only for when the data crosses the kernel/user boundry, just
> > > use le32 in the kernel for stuff like this.
> > > 
> > But that throws a compile error.
> 
> What error?

drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/fw.c:192:3: error: unknown type name
‘le32’; did you mean ‘__le32’?

	- Anirudh