Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399
From: Sebastian Fricke
Date: Sat Feb 13 2021 - 06:23:04 EST
Hey Heiko,
On 11.02.2021 15:42, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021, 06:25:15 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke:
Hey Heiko,
On 10.02.2021 12:15, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>Hi Sebastian,
>
>Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> I did some tests myself today as well and can confirm your
>> hdmi related finding - at least when plugged in on boot.
>>
>> I tried some combinations of camera vs. hdmi and it seems
>> really only when hdmi is plugged in on boot
>
>as you can see in v2, it should work now even with hdmi
>connected on boot. My patch ignored the grf-clock when
>doing the grf-based init.
>
>All clocks are on during boot and I guess the hdmi-driver
>did disable it after its probe. The phy_power_on functions
>did handle it correctly already, so it was only happening
>with hdmi connected on boot.
Thank you very much for solving that problem, I've tested the scenarios
described below and it works like a charm. (With your V2)
>
>
>Btw. do you plan on submitting your ov13850 driver
>soonish?
Actually, I have posted the patch already see here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20210130182313.32903-2-sebastian.fricke@xxxxxxxxxx/
very cool to see
I currently review the requested changes and questions and will soon
post a second version, but I expect quite some time until it is actually
merged.
could you Cc me on future versions?
Sure will do :)
Thanks
Heiko
Sebastian
Greetings,
Sebastian
>
>
>>
>> (1)
>> - boot
>> - camera
>> --> works
>>
>> (2)
>> - boot
>> - camera
>> - hdmi plugged in
>> - hdmi works
>> - camera
>> --> works
>>
>> (3)
>> - hdmi plugged in
>> - boot
>> - hdmi works
>> - camera
>> --> camera doesn't work
>>
>> (4)
>> - boot
>> - hdmi plugged in
>> - hdmi works
>> - camera
>> -> camera works
>>
>>
>> With a bit of brute-force [0] it seems the camera also works again even
>> with hdmi connected on boot. So conclusion would be that some clock
>> is misbehaving.
>>
>> Now we'll "only" need to find out which one that is.
>>
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>>
>> [0]
>> Don't disable any clock gates
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
>> index 070dc47e95a1..8daf1fc3388c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
>> @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ static void clk_gate_endisable(struct clk_hw *hw, int enable)
>>
>> set ^= enable;
>>
>> +if (!enable)
>> +return;
>> +
>> if (gate->lock)
>> spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
>> else
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 09:15:47 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner:
>> > Hi Sebastian,
>> >
>> > Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 07:43:35 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke:
>> > > On 03.02.2021 20:54, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> > > >Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021, 19:14:22 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke:
>> > > >> I have tested your patch set on my nanoPC-T4, here is a complete log
>> > > >> with:
>> > > >> - relevant kernel log entries
>> > > >> - system information
>> > > >> - media ctl output
>> > > >> - sysfs entry information
>> > > >>
>> > > >> https://paste.debian.net/1183874/
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Additionally, to your patchset I have applied the following patches:
>> > > >> https://github.com/initBasti/Linux_kernel_media_tree_fork/commits/dual_cam_setup
>> > > >>
>> > > >> And just to not cause confusion the `media_dev` entries come from this
>> > > >> unmerged series:
>> > > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=426269
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I have actually been able to stream with both of my cameras at the same
>> > > >> time using the libcamera cam command.
>> > > >> I would like to thank you a lot for making this possible.
>> > > >
>> > > >Thanks for testing a dual camera setup. On my board I could only test
>> > > >the second ISP. And really glad it works for you tool :-) .
>> > > >
>> > > >Out of curiosity, do you also see that green tint in the images the cameras
>> > > >produce?
>> > >
>> > > Yes, I do. Actually, I currently have two forms of a green tint, on my
>> > > OV13850 everything is quite dark and greenish, which is caused by the
>> > > missing 3A algorithms. On my OV4689, I have big patches of the image
>> > > with bright green color and flickering, I investigated if this is
>> > > connected to the 2nd ISP instance, but that doesn't seem to be the case
>> > > as I have the same results when I switch the CSI ports of the cameras.
>> > >
>> > > I have found another issue, while testing I discovered following
>> > > issue:
>> > > When I start the system with an HDMI monitor connected, then the camera
>> > > on the 2nd port doesn't work. This is probably because the RX/TX is
>> > > reserved as a TX.
>> > > But it made me wonder because if the system has an RX, a TX, and
>> > > an RX/TX, why isn't the pure TX used by the monitor and the
>> > > cameras take RX and RX/TX?
>> > > Or do you think that this is maybe a malfunction of this patch?
>> >
>> > I don't think it is an issue with this specific series, but still puzzling.
>> >
>> > I.e. the DPHYs are actually only relevant to the DSI controllers,
>> > with TX0 being connected to DSI0 and TX1RX1 being connected
>> > to DSI1. So having an hdmi display _in theory_ shouldn't matter at all.
>> >
>> > Out of curiosity what happens, when you boot without hdmi connected
>> > turn on the cameras, connect the hdmi after this, try the cameras again?
>> >
>> >
>> > Heiko
>> >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >Thanks
>> > > >Heiko
>> > >
>> > > Greetings,
>> > > Sebastian
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >> If you like to you can add:
>> > > >> Tested-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 02.02.2021 15:56, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> > > >> >The rk3399 has two ISPs and right now only the first one is usable.
>> > > >> >The second ISP is connected to the TXRX dphy on the soc.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >The phy of ISP1 is only accessible through the DSI controller's
>> > > >> >io-memory, so this series adds support for simply using the dsi
>> > > >> >controller is a phy if needed.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >That solution is needed at least on rk3399 and rk3288 but no-one
>> > > >> >has looked at camera support on rk3288 at all, so right now
>> > > >> >only implement the rk3399 specifics.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >Heiko Stuebner (6):
>> > > >> > drm/rockchip: dsi: add own additional pclk handling
>> > > >> > dt-bindings: display: rockchip-dsi: add optional #phy-cells property
>> > > >> > drm/rockchip: dsi: add ability to work as a phy instead of full dsi
>> > > >> > arm64: dts: rockchip: add #phy-cells to mipi-dsi1
>> > > >> > arm64: dts: rockchip: add cif clk-control pinctrl for rk3399
>> > > >> > arm64: dts: rockchip: add isp1 node on rk3399
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > .../display/rockchip/dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip.txt | 1 +
>> > > >> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 39 ++
>> > > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Kconfig | 2 +
>> > > >> > .../gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c | 342 ++++++++++++++++++
>> > > >> > 4 files changed, 384 insertions(+)
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
>