Re: [PATCH v5 12/17] iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sun Feb 14 2021 - 08:20:54 EST

Next message: Dejin Zheng: "[PATCH 0/3] Add missing call to 'pci_free_irq_vectors()'"
Previous message: Zhengqiao Xia: "Re: drm/panel: Add inx Himax8279d MIPI-DSI LCD panel"
In reply to: Alexandru Ardelean: "[PATCH v5 12/17] iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers"
Next in thread: Alexandru Ardelean: "Re: [PATCH v5 12/17] iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:24:47 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With this change, calling iio_device_attach_buffer() will actually attach
> more buffers.
> Right now this doesn't do any validation of whether a buffer is attached
> twice; maybe that can be added later (if needed). Attaching a buffer more
> than once should yield noticeably bad results.
>
> The first buffer is the legacy buffer, so a reference is kept to it.
>
> At this point, accessing the data for the extra buffers (that are added
> after the first one) isn't possible yet.
>
> The iio_device_attach_buffer() is also changed to return an error code,
> which for now is -ENOMEM if the array could not be realloc-ed for more
> buffers.

This is called from a bunch of places, so we need to add error handling
for those which isn't currently present.

Now arguably it is unlikely to fail, so I'm not that bothered about seeing
them all in place as part of this series, but I would like the handling
to have been posted at least.

Otherwise, a few passing comments in here, but nothing to actually change.

Jonathan

>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/iio_core.h | 2 +
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 6 +-
> include/linux/iio/buffer.h | 4 +-
> include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h | 3 +
> include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h | 4 ++
> 6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/iio_core.h b/drivers/iio/iio_core.h
> index 87868fff7d37..4690c3240a5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/iio_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/iio_core.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ void iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
>
> void iio_disable_all_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> void iio_buffer_wakeup_poll(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> +void iio_buffers_put(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
>
> #else
>
> @@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ static inline void iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) {}
>
> static inline void iio_disable_all_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) {}
> static inline void iio_buffer_wakeup_poll(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) {}
> +static inline void iio_buffers_put(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) {}
>
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 209b3a32bdbb..1e8e4c2ff00e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -193,12 +193,14 @@ __poll_t iio_buffer_poll(struct file *filp,
> */
> void iio_buffer_wakeup_poll(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> - struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
> -
> - if (!buffer)
> - return;
> + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> + struct iio_buffer *buffer;
> + unsigned int i;
>
> - wake_up(&buffer->pollq);
> + for (i = 0; i < iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt; i++) {
> + buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[i];
> + wake_up(&buffer->pollq);
> + }
> }
>
> void iio_buffer_init(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> @@ -212,6 +214,18 @@ void iio_buffer_init(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iio_buffer_init);
>
> +void iio_buffers_put(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> + struct iio_buffer *buffer;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt; i++) {
> + buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[i];
> + iio_buffer_put(buffer);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t iio_show_scan_index(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> @@ -1453,9 +1467,11 @@ static void __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
>
> int iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> - struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
> + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> - int i;
> + struct iio_buffer *buffer;
> + int unwind_idx;
> + int ret, i;
>
> channels = indio_dev->channels;
> if (channels) {
> @@ -1466,22 +1482,46 @@ int iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> indio_dev->masklength = ml;
> }
>
> - if (!buffer)
> + if (!iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt)
> return 0;
>
> - return __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(buffer, indio_dev, 0);
> + for (i = 0; i < iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt; i++) {
> + buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[i];
> + ret = __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(buffer, indio_dev, i);
> + if (ret) {
> + unwind_idx = i;
> + goto error_unwind_sysfs_and_mask;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +error_unwind_sysfs_and_mask:
> + for (; unwind_idx >= 0; unwind_idx--) {
> + buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[unwind_idx];
> + __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer);
> + }
> + kfree(iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> void iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {

Perhaps we should do a follow up adjusting names to slightly better
reflect they are not handling multiple buffers.

> - struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
> + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> + struct iio_buffer *buffer;
> + int i;
>
> - if (!buffer)
> + if (!iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt)
> return;
>
> iio_buffer_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups(indio_dev);
>
> - __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer);
> + for (i = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[i];
> + __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer);
> + }
> +
> + kfree(iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers);

Hmm. This does feel like it's in slightly the wrong place, but
I'm not sure where it actually should be.

Given this is the last element in the call sequence I guess it doesn't
makes sense to bring in another function just to tidy up this connection.

> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1599,13 +1639,35 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_buffer_put);
> * @indio_dev: The device the buffer should be attached to
> * @buffer: The buffer to attach to the device
> *
> + * Return 0 if successful, negative if error.
> + *
> * This function attaches a buffer to a IIO device. The buffer stays attached to
> - * the device until the device is freed. The function should only be called at
> - * most once per device.
> + * the device until the device is freed. For legacy reasons, the first attached
> + * buffer will also be assigned to 'indio_dev->buffer'.
> */
> -void iio_device_attach_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> - struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> +int iio_device_attach_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> {
> - indio_dev->buffer = iio_buffer_get(buffer);
> + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> + struct iio_buffer **new, **old = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers;
> + unsigned int cnt = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt;
> +
> + cnt++;
> +
> + new = krealloc(old, sizeof(*new) * cnt, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers = new;
> +
> + buffer = iio_buffer_get(buffer);
> +
> + /* first buffer is legacy; attach it to the IIO device directly */
> + if (!indio_dev->buffer)
> + indio_dev->buffer = buffer;
> +
> + iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[cnt - 1] = buffer;
> + iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt = cnt;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_device_attach_buffer);
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> index 1be94df3e591..26b05dddfa71 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static void iio_dev_release(struct device *device)
> iio_device_unregister_eventset(indio_dev);
> iio_device_unregister_sysfs(indio_dev);
>
> - iio_buffer_put(indio_dev->buffer);
> + iio_buffers_put(indio_dev);
>
> ida_simple_remove(&iio_ida, indio_dev->id);
> kfree(iio_dev_opaque);
> @@ -1884,12 +1884,12 @@ int __iio_device_register(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct module *this_mod)
> indio_dev->setup_ops == NULL)
> indio_dev->setup_ops = &noop_ring_setup_ops;
>
> - if (indio_dev->buffer)
> + if (iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt)
> cdev_init(&indio_dev->chrdev, &iio_buffer_fileops);
> else if (iio_dev_opaque->event_interface)
> cdev_init(&indio_dev->chrdev, &iio_event_fileops);
>
> - if (indio_dev->buffer || iio_dev_opaque->event_interface) {
> + if (iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt || iio_dev_opaque->event_interface) {
> indio_dev->dev.devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(iio_devt), indio_dev->id);
> indio_dev->chrdev.owner = this_mod;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> index 8febc23f5f26..b6928ac5c63d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline int iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> bool iio_validate_scan_mask_onehot(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> const unsigned long *mask);
>
> -void iio_device_attach_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> - struct iio_buffer *buffer);
> +int iio_device_attach_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_buffer *buffer);
>
> #endif /* _IIO_BUFFER_GENERIC_H_ */
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> index 41044320e581..768b90c64412 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ struct iio_buffer {
> /* @demux_bounce: Buffer for doing gather from incoming scan. */
> void *demux_bounce;
>
> + /* @attached_entry: Entry in the devices list of buffers attached by the driver. */
> + struct list_head attached_entry;
> +
> /* @buffer_list: Entry in the devices list of current buffers. */
> struct list_head buffer_list;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h b/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
> index 3e4c3cd248fd..c909835b6247 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> * struct iio_dev_opaque - industrial I/O device opaque information
> * @indio_dev: public industrial I/O device information
> * @event_interface: event chrdevs associated with interrupt lines
> + * @attached_buffers: array of buffers statically attached by the driver
> + * @attached_buffers_cnt: number of buffers in the array of statically attached buffers
> * @buffer_list: list of all buffers currently attached
> * @channel_attr_list: keep track of automatically created channel
> * attributes
> @@ -24,6 +26,8 @@
> struct iio_dev_opaque {
> struct iio_dev indio_dev;
> struct iio_event_interface *event_interface;
> + struct iio_buffer **attached_buffers;
> + unsigned int attached_buffers_cnt;
> struct list_head buffer_list;
> struct list_head channel_attr_list;
> struct attribute_group chan_attr_group;

Next message: Dejin Zheng: "[PATCH 0/3] Add missing call to 'pci_free_irq_vectors()'"
Previous message: Zhengqiao Xia: "Re: drm/panel: Add inx Himax8279d MIPI-DSI LCD panel"
In reply to: Alexandru Ardelean: "[PATCH v5 12/17] iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers"
Next in thread: Alexandru Ardelean: "Re: [PATCH v5 12/17] iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]