Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Add bindings for Chipone ICN6211

[Jagan Teki]

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 5:28 PM Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey Jagan,
>
> Thanks for submitting this.
>
> checkpatch.pl threw some typ-o warnings, and I listed them below. I
> think either spelling is correct, but 'spelling.txt' does list this as
> a typ-o explicitly, so I would suggest conforming to that just to
> silence the checkpatch warning.
>
> This patch also passes 'dt_binding_check' and 'dtbs_check', but I
> think I'd like to defer to Rob Herring for an actual r-b.
>
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 18:55, Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > ICN6211 is MIPI-DSI to RGB Convertor bridge from Chipone.
> >
> > It has a flexible configuration of MIPI DSI signal input and
> > produce RGB565, RGB666, RGB888 output format.
> >
> > Add dt-bingings for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes for v3:
> > - updated to new dt-bindings style
> >
> >  .../display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml       | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..13764f13fe46
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Chipone ICN6211 MIPI-DSI to RGB Converter bridge
>
> $ scripts/checkpatch.pl --git HEAD~0
> WARNING: 'Convertor' may be misspelled - perhaps 'Converter'?

Thanks for pointing it.

I was aware of it before sending it and need to understand whether we
need to use vendor naming conversion or not. Chipone call these
devices are Convertor [1], So I have used the vendor notation for
better understanding.

Any comments are this would be welcome?

[1] http://en.chiponeic.com/content/details45_123.html

Jagan.