Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register

From: mdalam
Date: Tue Feb 16 2021 - 12:54:41 EST


On 2021-02-16 13:46, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Hello,

Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 16 Feb 2021
00:46:42 +0530:

From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to
read last codeword. This change will add the READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n
register.

For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
use.

Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[V6]

It is also very important that you mark the version in the subject:

[PATCH v6] mtd: rawnand: etc

Otherwise it is difficult to keep track on the changes.

Sure I will follow the same.

* Updated write_reg_dma() function in "v6"
* Removed extra indentation level in read_page_ecc() to read last code word in "v6"
* Removed boolean check in config_nand_cw_read() in "v6"
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index 667e4bf..bae352f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_1 0xf24
#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_2 0xf28
#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_3 0xf2c
+#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0 0xf40
+#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1 0xf44
+#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2 0xf48
+#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3 0xf4c

/* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
#define NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE 0xdead
@@ -181,8 +185,14 @@
#define ECC_BCH_4BIT BIT(2)
#define ECC_BCH_8BIT BIT(3)

-#define nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \
-nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg, \
+#define nandc_set_read_loc_first(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \
+nandc_set_reg(nandc, reg, \
+ ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) | \
+ ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
+ ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
+
+#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \
+nandc_set_reg(nandc, reg, \
((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) | \
((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
@@ -316,6 +326,10 @@ struct nandc_regs {
__le32 read_location1;
__le32 read_location2;
__le32 read_location3;
+ __le32 read_location_last0;
+ __le32 read_location_last1;
+ __le32 read_location_last2;
+ __le32 read_location_last3;

__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_clr;
__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_set;
@@ -644,6 +658,14 @@ static __le32 *offset_to_nandc_reg(struct nandc_regs *regs, int offset)
return &regs->read_location2;
case NAND_READ_LOCATION_3:
return &regs->read_location3;
+ case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0:
+ return &regs->read_location_last0;
+ case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1:
+ return &regs->read_location_last1;
+ case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2:
+ return &regs->read_location_last2;
+ case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3:
+ return &regs->read_location_last3;
default:
return NULL;
}
@@ -661,6 +683,26 @@ static void nandc_set_reg(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, int offset,
*reg = cpu_to_le32(val);
}

+/* helper to configure location register values */
+static void nandc_set_read_loc(struct nand_chip *chip, int cw, int reg,
+ int offset, int size, int is_last)

You know cw, you have access to chip->ecc.steps, so you can derive by
yourself if is_last is set or not. No need to forward it through
function calls.


This "is_last" is not for last code word, it will indicate the Location register "NAND_READ_LOCATION_n" last bit.

bit[31]: Indicate this is the last Read location needing processing.


+{
+ struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
+ struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
+
+ int loc = NAND_READ_LOCATION_0;
+
+ if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
+ loc = NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0;
+
+ loc += reg * 4;
+
+ if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))

Just compute is_last a single time at the top of the helper and use it.

This "is_last" is not for last code word, it will indicate the Location register last bit.

bit[31]: Indicate this is the last Read location needing processing.

+ return nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, loc, offset, size, is_last);
+ else
+ return nandc_set_read_loc_first(nandc, loc, offset, size, is_last);
+}
+
/* helper to configure address register values */
static void set_address(struct qcom_nand_host *host, u16 column, int page)
{
@@ -685,6 +727,7 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int num_cw, bool read)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = &host->chip;
struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
+ struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
u32 cmd, cfg0, cfg1, ecc_bch_cfg;

if (read) {
@@ -719,9 +762,14 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int num_cw, bool read)
nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_STATUS, host->clrreadstatus);
nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);

- if (read)
- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
- host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
+ if (read) {
+ if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, ecc->steps - 1, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
+ host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
+ else
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, 0, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
+ host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);

Here you should not have this extra indentation level as well,
nandc_set_read_log() should IMHO be able to hide the complexity of the
versions.

Yes , this one I will fix in next patch.

+ }
}

/*
@@ -1079,8 +1127,10 @@ static int write_data_dma(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, int reg_off,
* Helper to prepare DMA descriptors for configuring registers
* before reading a NAND page.
*/
-static void config_nand_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
+static void config_nand_page_read(struct nand_chip *chip)
{
+ struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
+

I don't get why you change the parameter from nandc to chip. Honnestly
I don't think it is a bad thing, I'm just curious to understand why. If
you want to do that, please start with a first patch just doing the
conversion, and then a second patch adding LAST_CW support. Otherwise
it is blurry.

Yes, here its not needed to change nandc to chip, i will revert this in next patch.

write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_ADDR0, 2, 0);
write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV0_CFG0, 3, 0);
write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EBI2_ECC_BUF_CFG, 1, 0);
@@ -1094,11 +1144,19 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
* before reading each codeword in NAND page.
*/
static void
-config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
+config_nand_cw_read(struct nand_chip *chip, bool use_ecc, int cw)
{
- if (nandc->props->is_bam)
- write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
- NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
+ struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
+ struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
+
+ if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
+ if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
+ write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0, 4,
+ NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
+ else
+ write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
+ NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
+ }

Same here, I am pretty sure we can abstract the complexity.

Here I did this because , i need pointer to struct nand_ecc_ctrl structure
to access ecc->steps for CW comparison for last code word. cw == (ecc->steps - 1)

So i think no separate patch needed for conversion of nanc-->chip.
Please let me know if still separate patch needed for nanc-->chip conversion.


write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
@@ -1117,11 +1175,11 @@ config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
* single codeword in page
*/
static void
-config_nand_single_cw_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc,
- bool use_ecc)
+config_nand_single_cw_page_read(struct nand_chip *chip,
+ bool use_ecc, int cw)
{
- config_nand_page_read(nandc);
- config_nand_cw_read(nandc, use_ecc);
+ config_nand_page_read(chip);
+ config_nand_cw_read(chip, use_ecc, cw);
}

/*
@@ -1205,7 +1263,7 @@ static int nandc_param(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD_RESTORE, nandc->vld);
}

- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, 512, 1);
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, 0, 0, 0, 512, 1);

if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {
write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD, 1, 0);
@@ -1215,7 +1273,7 @@ static int nandc_param(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
nandc->buf_count = 512;
memset(nandc->data_buffer, 0xff, nandc->buf_count);

- config_nand_single_cw_page_read(nandc, false);
+ config_nand_single_cw_page_read(chip, false, 0);

read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, nandc->data_buffer,
nandc->buf_count, 0);
@@ -1617,7 +1675,7 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
clear_bam_transaction(nandc);
set_address(host, host->cw_size * cw, page);
update_rw_regs(host, 1, true);
- config_nand_page_read(nandc);
+ config_nand_page_read(chip);

data_size1 = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1);
oob_size1 = host->bbm_size;
@@ -1633,19 +1691,19 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
}

if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
read_loc += data_size1;

- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
read_loc += oob_size1;

- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
read_loc += data_size2;

- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
}

- config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false);
+ config_nand_cw_read(chip, false, cw);

read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, data_buf, data_size1, 0);
reg_off += data_size1;
@@ -1856,7 +1914,7 @@ static int read_page_ecc(struct qcom_nand_host *host, u8 *data_buf,
u8 *data_buf_start = data_buf, *oob_buf_start = oob_buf;
int i, ret;

- config_nand_page_read(nandc);
+ config_nand_page_read(chip);

/* queue cmd descs for each codeword */
for (i = 0; i < ecc->steps; i++) {
@@ -1873,18 +1931,16 @@ static int read_page_ecc(struct qcom_nand_host *host, u8 *data_buf,

if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
if (data_buf && oob_buf) {
- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, data_size,
- oob_size, 1);
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 1, data_size, oob_size, 1);
} else if (data_buf) {
- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
} else {
- nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, data_size,
- oob_size, 1);
+ nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, data_size, oob_size, 1);
}
}

- config_nand_cw_read(nandc, true);
+ config_nand_cw_read(chip, true, i);

if (data_buf)
read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, data_buf,
@@ -1946,7 +2002,7 @@ static int copy_last_cw(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int page)
set_address(host, host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1), page);
update_rw_regs(host, 1, true);

- config_nand_single_cw_page_read(nandc, host->use_ecc);
+ config_nand_single_cw_page_read(chip, host->use_ecc, ecc->steps - 1);

read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, nandc->data_buffer, size, 0);


Thanks,
Miquèl