[PATCH 1/3] misc: lis3lv02d: Fix false-positive WARN on various HP models

[Hans de Goede]

Before this commit lis3lv02d_get_pwron_wait() had a WARN_ONCE() to catch
a potential divide by 0. WARN macros should only be used to catch internal
kernel bugs and that is not the case here. We have been receiving a lot of
bug reports about kernel backtraces caused by this WARN.

The div value being checked comes from the lis3->odrs[] array. Which
is sized to be a power-of-2 matching the number of bits in lis3->odr_mask.

The only lis3 model where this array is not entirely filled with non zero
values. IOW the only model where we can hit the div == 0 check is the
3dc ("8 bits 3DC sensor") model:

int lis3_3dc_rates[16] = {0, 1, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 1600, 5000};

Note the 0 value at index 0, according to the datasheet an odr index of 0
means "Power-down mode". HP typically uses a lis3 accelerometer for HDD
fall protection. What I believe is happening here is that on newer
HP devices, which only contain a SDD, the BIOS is leaving the lis3 device
powered-down since it is not used for HDD fall protection.

Note that the lis3_3dc_rates array initializer only specifies 10 values,
which matches the datasheet. So it also contains 6 zero values at the end.

Replace the WARN with a normal check, which treats an odr index of 0
as power-down and uses a normal dev_err() to report the error in case
odr index point past the initialized part of the array.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785814
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817027
BugLink: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10720
Fixes: 1510dd5954be ("lis3lv02d: avoid divide by zero due to unchecked")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/misc/lis3lv02d/lis3lv02d.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lis3lv02d/lis3lv02d.c b/drivers/misc/lis3lv02d/lis3lv02d.c
index dd65cedf3b12..9d14bf444481 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lis3lv02d/lis3lv02d.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lis3lv02d/lis3lv02d.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int lis3_3dc_rates[16] = {0, 1, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 1600, 5000};
 static int lis3_3dlh_rates[4] = {50, 100, 400, 1000};
 
 /* ODR is Output Data Rate */
-static int lis3lv02d_get_odr(struct lis3lv02d *lis3)
+static int lis3lv02d_get_odr_index(struct lis3lv02d *lis3)
 {
 	u8 ctrl;
 	int shift;
@@ -216,15 +216,23 @@ static int lis3lv02d_get_odr(struct lis3lv02d *lis3)
 	lis3->read(lis3, CTRL_REG1, &ctrl);
 	ctrl &= lis3->odr_mask;
 	shift = ffs(lis3->odr_mask) - 1;
-	return lis3->odrs[(ctrl >> shift)];
+	return (ctrl >> shift);
 }
 
 static int lis3lv02d_get_pwron_wait(struct lis3lv02d *lis3)
 {
-	int div = lis3lv02d_get_odr(lis3);
+	int odr_idx = lis3lv02d_get_odr_index(lis3);
+	int div = lis3->odrs[odr_idx];
 
-	if (WARN_ONCE(div == 0, "device returned spurious data"))
+	if (div == 0) {
+		if (odr_idx == 0) {
+			/* Power-down mode, not sampling no need to sleep */
+			return 0;
+		}
+
+		dev_err(&lis3->pdev->dev, "Error unknown odrs-index: %d\n", odr_idx);
 		return -ENXIO;
+	}
 
 	/* LIS3 power on delay is quite long */
 	msleep(lis3->pwron_delay / div);
@@ -816,9 +824,12 @@ static ssize_t lis3lv02d_rate_show(struct device *dev,
 			struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	struct lis3lv02d *lis3 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int odr_idx;
 
 	lis3lv02d_sysfs_poweron(lis3);
-	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", lis3lv02d_get_odr(lis3));
+
+	odr_idx = lis3lv02d_get_odr_index(lis3);
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", lis3->odrs[odr_idx]);
 }
 
 static ssize_t lis3lv02d_rate_set(struct device *dev,
-- 
2.30.1