Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] hugetlb: don't permit pmd sharing if soft dirty in use
From: Peter Xu
Date: Wed Feb 17 2021 - 14:47:02 EST
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:03:21PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> If page modifications are being monitoried with the soft dirty mechanism,
> then this information is contained in page table entries. Tracking is
> enabled on a 'per-process' basis. hugetlb pmd sharing allows processes
> to share page table entries. This makes pmd sharing incompatible with
> soft dirty monitoring. So, pmd sharing must be disabled if soft dirty
> tracking is in use.
>
> The VM_SOFTDIRTY flag is set in all vma's by default. When soft dirty
> monitoring is started, the flag is cleared. We can therefore allow pmd
> sharing in vmas with the VM_SOFTDIRTY flag set. Check this when deciding
> to perform pmd sharing.
>
> A subsequent patch will add code to allow soft dirty monitoring for hugetlb
> vmas. Any existing pmd sharing will be undone at that time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index b561b6867ec1..cf4aa63be9b1 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -5285,6 +5285,13 @@ static bool vma_shareable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> unsigned long base = addr & PUD_MASK;
> unsigned long end = base + PUD_SIZE;
>
> + /*
> + * Do not allow pmd sharing if soft dirty tracking is in use.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) &&
> + !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SOFTDIRTY))
> + return false;
> +
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
The indent of using three tabs is a bit weird to me, though.. I do see this
happen somewhere else in the repo too, so maybe it's a way to indent that I
don't know.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu