Re: [PATCH v25 5/5] remoteproc: Add initial zynqmp R5 remoteproc driver

From: Mathieu Poirier
Date: Wed Feb 17 2021 - 16:51:45 EST

Next message: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf: "Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] dwmac-sun8i cleanup and shutdown hook"
Previous message: Tim Chen: "[PATCH v2 3/3] mm: Fix missing mem cgroup soft limit tree updates"
In reply to: Mathieu Poirier: "Re: [PATCH v25 5/5] remoteproc: Add initial zynqmp R5 remoteproc driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:11:37PM +0000, Ben Levinsky wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> I worked on this further and had 1 more comment on the prepare/unprepare for TCM banks below
>

[...]

> > > > + */
> > > > +static int tcm_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry
> > > *mem)
> > > > +{
> > > > + u32 pnode_id = (u64)mem->priv;
> > > > +
> > > > + iounmap(mem->va);
> > > > + return zynqmp_pm_release_node(pnode_id);
> > >
> > > Is the opposite of that call zynqmp_pm_request_node()? If so doing the
> > > power up
> > > and down of the TCM banks at driver probe() and remove() is highly
> > > inefficient.
> > > Consider using rproc_ops::prepare() and rproc_ops::unprepare().
> > >
> If I understand your comment correctly this is about handling the request_node() and release_node() calls. While its true that these two functions can be moved to prepare and unprepared I think these are still occurring not at probe nor remove.
>

Your assesment is corret and I am in the wrong. Unfortunately that's what
happens when reviews are spread out over several days.

> For request_node() of the TCM bank this is occurring in parse_fw() in remoteproc_core as in the zynqmp_r5 driver shows below:
>
> .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
> ...
> Zynqmp_parse_fw calls parse_tcm_banks
>
> static int parse_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc){
> ...
> ret = zynqmp_r5_pm_request_sram(rsc.start);
> ...
> mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, rsc.start,
> (size_t)size, rsc.start,
> tcm_mem_alloc,
> tcm_mem_release,
> rsc.name);
>
> For release_node() this is occurring not at remove but instead is managed by remoteproc_core and tied to the lifecyle of the remoteproc carveout since release_node() is within the function tcm_mem_release() and therefore rproc_resource_cleanup() will end up triggering
> TCM bank cleanup.
>
>
> Still it is understandable to prefer prepare/unprepared to contain the 2 lines.
>
>
> If you still prefer prepare/unprepared is the following implementation ok?
>

The prepare/unprepare functions have been added to specifically handle cases
such as this one where miscellanous actions need to be taken before accessing
the HW. Using them guarantees the same behavior as the remoteproc core
evolves, something that is less certain for parse_fw and resource cleanup.

> prepare:
> Just move request_node() line here
> unprepare:
> similarly this is only moving the 1 line of release_node().

That will be just fine.

>
> If this suggestion satisfies what you are saying I will do so, otherwise please correct my understanding
>
>
> Cheers
> Ben
>
>
>
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > Please move this just after tcm_mem_alloc()
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start
> > > > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv;
> > > > + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
> > > > +
> > > > + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr & 0xF0000000) == 0xF0000000 ?
> > > > + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
> > > > +
> > > > + dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "RPU boot from %s.",
> > > > + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
> > > > +
> > > > + return zynqmp_pm_request_wake(z_rproc->pnode_id, 1,
> > > > + bootmem,
> > > ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop
> > > > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Power down R5 Core.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv;
> > > > +
> > > > + return zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(z_rproc->pnode_id,
> > > > + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc
> > > > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> > > > + * @mem: mem entry to map
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc,
> > > > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> > > > +{
> > > > + void *va;
> > > > +
> > > > + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > + mem->va = va;
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release
> > > > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> > > > + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Unmap memory-region carveout
> > > > + *
> > > > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
> > > > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> > > > +{
> > > > + iounmap(mem->va);
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * parse_mem_regions
> > > > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in
> > > > + * memory-region property
> > > > + *
> > > > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int parse_mem_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv;
> > > > + struct device_node *np = z_rproc->dev->of_node;
> > > > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > > > + struct of_phandle_iterator it;
> > > > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> > > > + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> > > > + int index = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
> > > > + of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, DDR_LIST_PROP, NULL, 0);
> > > > + while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) {
> > > > + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
> > > > + if (!rmem) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire %s\n",
> > > DDR_LIST_PROP);
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (strstr(it.node->name, "vdev0buffer")) {
> > > > + mem = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(dev, index,
> > > > + rmem->size,
> > > > + rmem->base,
> > > > + "vdev0buffer");
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * The ensuing carveout is either for vring, which has
> > > > + * device tree node name of length 15 characters, or
> > > > + * firmware mem, where name is not used by
> > > remoteproc
> > > > + * core later on. So default to vring length of 15.
> > >
> > > s/"* core"/"* core"
> > >
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Extra char for null-terminated string.
> > > > + */
> > > > + char name[16];
> > > > +
> > > > + if (strstr(it.node->name, "vdev0vring")) {
> > > > + int vring_id;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Expect "rpuXvdev0vringX" as documented
> > > > + * in xilinx remoteproc device tree binding
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (strlen(it.node->name) < 15) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "%pOF is less than 15
> > > chars",
> > > > + it.node);
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * can be 1 of multiple vring IDs per IPC
> > > channel
> > > > + * e.g. 'vdev0vring0' and 'vdev0vring1'
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Here get vring ID from 15th char
> > > > + */
> > > > + vring_id = it.node->name[14] - '0';
> > > > + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev0vring%d",
> > > vring_id);
> > >
> > > Function strstr() returns a pointer to the beginning of the string being
> > > searched for. As such you should be able to do something like:
> > >
> > > name = strstr(it.node->name, "vdev0vring");
> > > if (name) {
> > > ...
> > >
> > > and simply use @name when calling rproc_mem_entry_init().
> > >
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + strncpy(name, it.node->name, 16);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL,
> > > > + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> > > > + rmem->size, rmem->base,
> > > > +
> > > zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc,
> > > > +
> > > zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release,
> > > > + name);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!mem)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
> > > > + index++;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_pm_request_tcm
> > > > + * @addr: base address of mem provided in R5 core's sram property.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Given sram base address, determine its corresponding Xilinx
> > > > + * Platform Management ID and then request access to this node
> > > > + * so that it can be power up.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int zynqmp_r5_pm_request_sram(phys_addr_t addr)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int i;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_SRAMS; i++) {
> > > > + if (zynqmp_banks[i].addr != addr)
> > > > + continue;
> > > > +
> > > > + return zynqmp_pm_request_node(zynqmp_banks[i].id,
> > > > + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS,
> > > 0,
> > > > +
> > > ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * tcm_mem_alloc
> > > > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> > > > + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5
> > > > + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank
> > > > + * remoteproc carveout.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int tcm_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc,
> > > > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> > > > +{
> > > > + void *va;
> > > > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> > > > +
> > > > + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Update memory entry va */
> > > > + mem->va = va;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000,
> > > > + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give
> > > > + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000).
> > > > + */
> > > > + mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and
> > > > + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses
> > > > + * (0x0 and 0x20000).
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000)
> > > > + mem->da -= 0x90000;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */
> > > > + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "invalid TCM bank address: %x\n", mem->da);
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * parse_tcm_banks()
> > > > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance
> > > > + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
> > > > + * needed for firmware to be loaded
> > > > + *
> > > > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int parse_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int i, num_banks;
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv;
> > > > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > > > + struct device_node *r5_node = z_rproc->dev->of_node;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* go through TCM banks for r5 node */
> > > > + num_banks = of_count_phandle_with_args(r5_node,
> > > BANK_LIST_PROP, NULL);
> > > > + if (num_banks <= 0) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n");
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> > > > + struct resource rsc;
> > > > + resource_size_t size;
> > > > + struct device_node *dt_node;
> > > > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > + u32 pnode_id; /* zynqmp_pm* fn's expect u32 */
> > > > +
> > > > + dt_node = of_parse_phandle(r5_node, BANK_LIST_PROP, i);
> > > > + if (!dt_node)
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = of_address_to_resource(dt_node, 0, &rsc);
> > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > + of_node_put(dt_node);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > + of_node_put(dt_node);
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_pm_request_sram(rsc.start);
> > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* add carveout */
> > > > + size = resource_size(&rsc);
> > > > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, rsc.start,
> > > > + (size_t)size, rsc.start,
> > > > + tcm_mem_alloc,
> > > > + tcm_mem_release,
> > > > + rsc.name);
> > > > + if (!mem) {
> > > > + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node(pnode_id);
> > >
> > > Where is @pnode_id initialised?
> >
> > Good catch. Previously this was value set in an earlier iteration. I will fix this
> > as follows:
> > - release the R5 cluster by instead passing z_rproc->pnode_id
> > - release the TCM bank via call to release_sram
> >
> > This will also remove the variable pnode_id.
> >
> > >
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + dev_warn(dev,
> > > > + "fail to release node: %x ret: %x\n",
> > > > + pnode_id, ret);
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + mem->priv = (void *)(u64)pnode_id;
> > >
> > >
> > > And here too - how does this work when you test things out on your side?
> > >
> > > Please note that I will need a reply to these questions before I review
> > another
> > > set.
> > >
> > Here I will update as follows:
> > - set mem->priv to value from zynqmp_banks lookup table that contains
> > power node IDs
> >
> >
> > > > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
> > > > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> > > > + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
> > > > + *
> > > > + * When loading firmware, ensure the necessary carveouts are in
> > > remoteproc
> > > > + *
> > > > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware
> > > *fw)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = parse_tcm_banks(rproc);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = parse_mem_regions(rproc);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> > > > + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * resource table only required for IPC.
> > > > + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
> > > > + * for example, loading r5 hello world application
> > > > + * so simply inform user and keep going.
> > > > + */
> > > > + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
> > > > + ret = 0;
> > > > + }
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick() - kick a firmware if mbox is provided
> > > > + * @rproc: r5 core's corresponding rproc structure
> > > > + * @vqid: virtqueue ID
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv;
> > > > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> > > > + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *mb_msg = NULL;
> > > > + unsigned int skb_len;
> > > > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* If vqid is negative, do not pass the vqid to
> > > > + * mailbox as vqid is supposed to be 0 or positive.
> > > > + * It also gives a way to just kick instead but
> > > > + * not use the IPI buffer.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * For now use negative vqid to assume no message will be
> > > > + * passed with IPI buffer, but just raise interrupt.
> > > > + * This will be faster as it doesn't need to copy the
> > > > + * message to the ZynqMP/Versal IPI message buffer.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (vqid >= 0) {
> > > > + skb_len = (unsigned int)(sizeof(vqid) + sizeof(mb_msg));
> > > > + skb = alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!skb)
> > > > + return;
> > > > +
> > > > + mb_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)skb_put(skb,
> > > skb_len);
> > > > + mb_msg->len = sizeof(vqid);
> > > > + memcpy(mb_msg->data, &vqid, sizeof(vqid));
> > > > +
> > > > + skb_queue_tail(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs, skb);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = mbox_send_message(z_rproc->tx_chan, mb_msg);
> > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to kick remote.\n");
> > > > + if (mb_msg) {
> > > > + skb_dequeue_tail(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs);
> > > > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > >
> > > I am done reviewing this set.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mathieu
> > >
> > > > +static struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
> > > > + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
> > > > + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
> > > > + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> > > > + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
> > > > + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> > > > + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> > > > + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> > > > + .kick = zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * event_notified_idr_cb() - event notified idr callback
> > > > + * @id: idr id
> > > > + * @ptr: pointer to idr private data
> > > > + * @data: data passed to idr_for_each callback
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Pass notification to remoteproc virtio
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Return: 0. having return is to satisfy the idr_for_each() function
> > > > + * pointer input argument requirement.
> > > > + **/
> > > > +static int event_notified_idr_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct rproc *rproc = data;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (rproc_vq_interrupt(rproc, id) == IRQ_NONE)
> > > > + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "no message was found in idr with id:
> > > %d\n", id);
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * handle_event_notified() - remoteproc notification work function
> > > > + * @work: pointer to the work structure
> > > > + *
> > > > + * It checks each registered remoteproc notify IDs.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void handle_event_notified(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc;
> > > > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > > > +
> > > > + z_rproc = container_of(work, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, mbox_work);
> > > > + rproc = z_rproc->rproc;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * This is to simply raise interrupt as ACK for remote.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Xilinx mailbox, ATF and SoC specific IPI mapping will handle
> > > > + * mapping to remote processor.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (mbox_send_message(z_rproc->rx_chan, NULL) < 0)
> > > > + dev_warn(rproc->dev.parent, "Failed to kick remote.\n");
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * We only use IPI for interrupt. The firmware side may or may
> > > > + * not write the notifyid when it trigger IPI.
> > > > + * And thus, we scan through all the registered notifyids.
> > > > + */
> > > > + idr_for_each(&rproc->notifyids, event_notified_idr_cb, rproc);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb() - Receive channel mailbox callback
> > > > + * @cl: mailbox client
> > > > + * @msg: message pointer
> > > > + *
> > > > + * It will schedule the R5 notification work.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc;
> > > > +
> > > > + z_rproc = container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, rx_mc);
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Notification can be received with message payload.
> > > > + * To handle this, check for message contents.
> > > > + * If there are contents, copy to ipi message buffer payload location.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * If message is empty, then that means that was simple raising
> > > > + * of interrupt. no payload to process.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Note: enqueue work regardless of msg as kick may imply that
> > > remote
> > > > + * is waiting for ack.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (msg) {
> > > > + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *ipi_msg, *buf_msg;
> > > > + size_t len;
> > > > +
> > > > + ipi_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)msg;
> > > > + buf_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)z_rproc->rx_mc_buf;
> > > > + len = (ipi_msg->len >= IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX) ?
> > > > + IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX : ipi_msg->len;
> > > > + buf_msg->len = len;
> > > > + memcpy(buf_msg->data, ipi_msg->data, len);
> > > > + }
> > > > + schedule_work(&z_rproc->mbox_work);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done() - Request has been sent to the remote
> > > > + * @cl: mailbox client
> > > > + * @msg: pointer to the message which has been sent
> > > > + * @r: status of last TX - OK or error
> > > > + *
> > > > + * It will be called by the mailbox framework when the last TX has done.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg,
> > int
> > > r)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc;
> > > > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!msg)
> > > > + return;
> > > > + z_rproc = container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, tx_mc);
> > > > + skb = skb_dequeue(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs);
> > > > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() - Setup mailboxes
> > > > + * this is used for each individual R5 core
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @z_rproc: pointer to the ZynqMP R5 processor platform data
> > > > + * @node: pointer of the device node
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Function to setup mailboxes to talk to RPU.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc,
> > > > + struct device_node *node)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct mbox_client *mclient;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Setup TX mailbox channel client */
> > > > + mclient = &z_rproc->tx_mc;
> > > > + mclient->dev = z_rproc->dev;
> > > > + mclient->tx_done = zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done;
> > > > + mclient->tx_block = false;
> > > > + mclient->knows_txdone = false;
> > > > + mclient->rx_callback = NULL;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Setup RX mailbox channel client */
> > > > + mclient = &z_rproc->rx_mc;
> > > > + mclient->dev = z_rproc->dev;
> > > > + mclient->tx_done = NULL;
> > > > + mclient->tx_block = false;
> > > > + mclient->knows_txdone = false;
> > > > + mclient->rx_callback = zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb;
> > > > +
> > > > + INIT_WORK(&z_rproc->mbox_work, handle_event_notified);
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Request TX and RX channels */
> > > > + z_rproc->tx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(&z_rproc-
> > > >tx_mc, "tx");
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(z_rproc->tx_chan)) {
> > > > + dev_err(z_rproc->dev, "failed to request mbox tx channel.\n");
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(z_rproc->tx_chan);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + z_rproc->rx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(&z_rproc-
> > > >rx_mc, "rx");
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(z_rproc->rx_chan)) {
> > > > + dev_err(z_rproc->dev, "failed to request mbox rx channel.\n");
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(z_rproc->rx_chan);
> > > > + }
> > > > + skb_queue_head_init(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs);
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc)
> > > > +{
> > > > + mbox_free_channel(z_rproc->tx_chan);
> > > > + mbox_free_channel(z_rproc->rx_chan);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_probe() - Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
> > > > + * this is called for each individual R5 core to
> > > > + * set up mailbox, Xilinx platform manager unique ID,
> > > > + * add to rproc core
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @pdev: domain platform device for current R5 core
> > > > + * @node: pointer of the device node for current R5 core
> > > > + * @rpu_mode: mode to configure RPU, split or lockstep
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *zynqmp_r5_probe(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev,
> > > > + struct device_node *node,
> > > > + enum rpu_oper_mode
> > > rpu_mode)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > + struct rproc *rproc_ptr;
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
> > > > + rproc_ptr = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev),
> > > &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
> > > > + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc));
> > > > + if (!rproc_ptr) {
> > > > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > > + goto error;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + rproc_ptr->auto_boot = false;
> > > > + z_rproc = rproc_ptr->priv;
> > > > + z_rproc->rproc = rproc_ptr;
> > > > + z_rproc->dev = dev;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Set up DMA mask */
> > > > + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + goto error;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Get R5 power domain node */
> > > > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "power-domain", &z_rproc-
> > > >pnode_id);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + goto error;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = r5_set_mode(z_rproc, rpu_mode);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + goto error;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "mboxes")) {
> > > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(z_rproc, node);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + goto error;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Add R5 remoteproc */
> > > > + ret = devm_rproc_add(dev, rproc_ptr);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(z_rproc);
> > > > + goto error;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return z_rproc;
> > > > +error:
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
> > > > + *
> > > > + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
> > > > + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int ret, core_count;
> > > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > + struct device_node *nc;
> > > > + enum rpu_oper_mode rpu_mode = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
> > > > + struct list_head *cluster; /* list to track each core's rproc */
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc;
> > > > + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
> > > > + struct list_head *pos;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode",
> > > &rpu_mode);
> > > > + if (ret < 0 || (rpu_mode != PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP &&
> > > > + rpu_mode != PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT)) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "invalid cluster mode: ret %d mode %x\n",
> > > > + ret, rpu_mode);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU configuration: %s\n",
> > > > + rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP ? "lockstep" :
> > > "split");
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * if 2 RPUs provided but one is lockstep, then we have an
> > > > + * invalid configuration.
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev->of_node);
> > > > + if ((rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP && core_count != 1) ||
> > > > + core_count > MAX_RPROCS)
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > + cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!cluster)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(cluster);
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "devm_of_platform_populate failed, ret =
> > > %d\n",
> > > > + ret);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* probe each individual r5 core's remoteproc-related info */
> > > > + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, nc) {
> > > > + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(nc);
> > > > + if (!child_pdev) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "could not get R5 core platform
> > > device\n");
> > > > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + z_rproc = zynqmp_r5_probe(child_pdev, nc, rpu_mode);
> > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "%s to probe rpu %pOF\n",
> > > > + ret ? "Failed" : "Able",
> > > > + nc);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(z_rproc)) {
> > > > + ret = PTR_ERR(z_rproc);
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > > > + list_add_tail(&z_rproc->elem, cluster);
> > > > + }
> > > > + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
> > > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +out:
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * undo core0 upon any failures on core1 in split-mode
> > > > + *
> > > > + * in zynqmp_r5_probe z_rproc is set to null
> > > > + * and ret to non-zero value if error
> > > > + */
> > > > + list_for_each(pos, cluster) {
> > > > + z_rproc = list_entry(pos, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, elem);
> > > > + zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(z_rproc);
> > > > + }
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove()
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
> > > > + *
> > > > + * When the driver is unloaded, clean up the mailboxes for each
> > > > + * remoteproc that was initially probed.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct list_head *pos, *temp, *cluster = (struct list_head *)
> > > > + platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = NULL;
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_safe(pos, temp, cluster) {
> > > > + z_rproc = list_entry(pos, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, elem);
> > > > + zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(z_rproc);
> > > > + list_del(pos);
> > > > + }
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
> > > > + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc", },
> > > > + { /* end of list */ },
> > > > +};
> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> > > > + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> > > > + .remove = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove,
> > > > + .driver = {
> > > > + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> > > > + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> > > > + },
> > > > +};
> > > > +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> > > > +
> > > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > > > --
> > > > 2.17.1
> > > >

Next message: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf: "Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] dwmac-sun8i cleanup and shutdown hook"
Previous message: Tim Chen: "[PATCH v2 3/3] mm: Fix missing mem cgroup soft limit tree updates"
In reply to: Mathieu Poirier: "Re: [PATCH v25 5/5] remoteproc: Add initial zynqmp R5 remoteproc driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]