On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:36 PM Alex Ghiti <alex@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Le 2/16/21 à 11:42 PM, Dmitry Vyukov a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 9:42 PM Alex Ghiti <alex@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Le 2/16/21 à 6:25 AM, Dmitry Vyukov a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:17 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:11 AM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was fixing KASAN support for my sv48 patchset so I took a look at your
issue: I built a kernel on top of the branch riscv/fixes using
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/269d24e857a757d09a898086a2fa6fa5d827c3e1/dashboard/config/linux/upstream-riscv64-kasan.config
and Buildroot 2020.11. I have the warnings regarding the use of
__virt_to_phys on wrong addresses (but that's normal since this function
is used in virt_addr_valid) but not the segfaults you describe.
Hi Alex,
Let me try to rebuild buildroot image. Maybe there was something wrong
with my build, though, I did 'make clean' before doing. But at the
same time it worked back in June...
Re WARNINGs, they indicate kernel bugs. I am working on setting up a
syzbot instance on riscv. If there a WARNING during boot then the
kernel will be marked as broken. No further testing will happen.
Is it a mis-use of WARN_ON? If so, could anybody please remove it or
replace it with pr_err.
Hi,
I've localized one issue with riscv/KASAN:
KASAN breaks VDSO and that's I think the root cause of weird faults I
saw earlier. The following patch fixes it.
Could somebody please upstream this fix? I don't know how to add/run
tests for this.
Thanks
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile
index 0cfd6da784f84..cf3a383c1799d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_vgettimeofday.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -Os
# Disable gcov profiling for VDSO code
GCOV_PROFILE := n
KCOV_INSTRUMENT := n
+KASAN_SANITIZE := n
# Force dependency
$(obj)/vdso.o: $(obj)/vdso.so
What's weird is that I don't have any issue without this patch with the
following config whereas it indeed seems required for KASAN. But when
looking at the segfaults you got earlier, the segfault address is 0xbb0
and the cause is an instruction page fault: this address is the PLT base
address in vdso.so and an instruction page fault would mean that someone
tried to jump at this address, which is weird. At first sight, that does
not seem related to your patch above, but clearly I may be wrong.
Tobias, did you observe the same segfaults as Dmitry ?
I noticed that not all buildroot images use VDSO, it seems to be
dependent on libc settings (at least I think I changed it in the
past).
Ok, I used uClibc but then when using glibc, I have the same segfaults,
only when KASAN is enabled. And your patch fixes the problem. I will try
to take a look later to better understand the problem.
I also booted an image completely successfully including dhcpd/sshd
start, but then my executable crashed in clock_gettime. The executable
was build on linux/amd64 host with "riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc -static"
(10.2.1).
Second issue I am seeing seems to be related to text segment size.
I check out v5.11 and use this config:
https://gist.github.com/dvyukov/6af25474d455437577a84213b0cc9178
This config gave my laptop a hard time ! Finally I was able to boot
correctly to userspace, but I realized I used my sv48 branch...Either I
fixed your issue along the way or I can't reproduce it, I'll give it a
try tomorrow.
Where is your branch? I could also test in my setup on your branch.
You can find my branch int/alex/riscv_kernel_end_of_address_space_v2
here: https://github.com/AlexGhiti/riscv-linux.git
No, it does not work for me.
Source is on b61ab6c98de021398cd7734ea5fc3655e51e70f2 (HEAD,
int/alex/riscv_kernel_end_of_address_space_v2)
Config is https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/6af25474d455437577a84213b0cc9178/raw/55b116522c14a8a98a7626d76df740d54f648ce5/gistfile1.txt
riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc -v
gcc version 10.2.1 20210110 (Debian 10.2.1-6+build1)
qemu-system-riscv64 --version
QEMU emulator version 5.2.0 (Debian 1:5.2+dfsg-3)
qemu-system-riscv64 \
-machine virt -smp 2 -m 2G \
-device virtio-blk-device,drive=hd0 \
-drive file=image-riscv64,if=none,format=raw,id=hd0 \
-kernel arch/riscv/boot/Image \
-nographic \
-device virtio-rng-device,rng=rng0 -object
rng-random,filename=/dev/urandom,id=rng0 \
-netdev user,id=net0,host=10.0.2.10,hostfwd=tcp::10022-:22 -device
virtio-net-device,netdev=net0 \
-append "root=/dev/vda earlyprintk=serial console=ttyS0 oops=panic
panic_on_warn=1 panic=86400 earlycon"
OpenSBI v0.8
____ _____ ____ _____
/ __ \ / ____| _ \_ _|
| | | |_ __ ___ _ __ | (___ | |_) || |
| | | | '_ \ / _ \ '_ \ \___ \| _ < | |
| |__| | |_) | __/ | | |____) | |_) || |_
\____/| .__/ \___|_| |_|_____/|____/_____|
| |
|_|
Platform Name : riscv-virtio,qemu
Platform Features : timer,mfdeleg
Platform HART Count : 2
Boot HART ID : 1
Boot HART ISA : rv64imafdcsu
BOOT HART Features : pmp,scounteren,mcounteren,time
BOOT HART PMP Count : 16
Firmware Base : 0x80000000
Firmware Size : 104 KB
Runtime SBI Version : 0.2
MIDELEG : 0x0000000000000222
MEDELEG : 0x000000000000b109
PMP0 : 0x0000000080000000-0x000000008001ffff (A)OpenSBI v0.6
no output after this
PMP1 : 0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff (A,R,W,X)
Thanks,
Then trying to boot it using:
QEMU emulator version 5.2.0 (Debian 1:5.2+dfsg-3)
$ qemu-system-riscv64 -machine virt -smp 2 -m 4G ...
It shows no output from the kernel whatsoever, even though I have
earlycon and output shows very early with other configs.
Kernel boots fine with defconfig and other smaller configs.
If I enable KASAN_OUTLINE and CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE, then this config
also boots fine. Both of these options significantly reduce kernel
size. However, I can also boot the kernel without these 2 configs, if
I disable a whole lot of subsystem configs. This makes me think that
there is an issue related to kernel size somewhere in
qemu/bootloader/kernel bootstrap code.
Does it make sense to you? Can somebody reproduce what I am seeing? >
I did not bring any answer to your question, but at least you know I'm
working on it, I'll keep you posted.
Thanks for taking the time to setup syzkaller.
Alex
Thanks
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv