Re: [PATCH V8 1/1] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Add shutdown callback for i2c

From: rojay
Date: Thu Feb 18 2021 - 12:01:49 EST


Hi Stephen,

On 2021-01-13 12:24, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Roja Rani Yarubandi (2021-01-08 07:05:45)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
index 214b4c913a13..c3f584795911 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
@@ -375,6 +375,32 @@ static void geni_i2c_tx_msg_cleanup(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c,
}
}

+static void geni_i2c_stop_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c)
+{
+ int ret;
+ u32 geni_status;
+ struct i2c_msg *cur;
+
+ /* Resume device, as runtime suspend can happen anytime during transfer */
+ ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(gi2c->se.dev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "Failed to resume device: %d\n", ret);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ geni_status = readl_relaxed(gi2c->se.base + SE_GENI_STATUS);
+ if (geni_status & M_GENI_CMD_ACTIVE) {
+ cur = gi2c->cur;

Why don't we need to hold the spinlock gi2c::lock here?


I am not seeing any race here. May I know which race are you suspecting here?

+ geni_i2c_abort_xfer(gi2c);
+ if (cur->flags & I2C_M_RD)
+ geni_i2c_rx_msg_cleanup(gi2c, cur);
+ else
+ geni_i2c_tx_msg_cleanup(gi2c, cur);
+ }
+
+ pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(gi2c->se.dev);
+}
+
static int geni_i2c_rx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg,
u32 m_param)
{