Re: [PATCH] net: hsr: add support for EntryForgetTime

From: George McCollister
Date: Thu Feb 18 2021 - 13:56:12 EST


On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:01 AM Marco Wenzel <marco.wenzel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In IEC 62439-3 EntryForgetTime is defined with a value of 400 ms. When a
> node does not send any frame within this time, the sequence number check
> for can be ignored. This solves communication issues with Cisco IE 2000
> in Redbox mode.
>
> Fixes: f421436a591d ("net/hsr: Add support for the High-availability Seamless Redundancy protocol (HSRv0)")
> Signed-off-by: Marco Wenzel <marco.wenzel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c | 9 +++++++--
> net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h | 1 +
> net/hsr/hsr_main.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c
> index 5c97de459905..805f974923b9 100644
> --- a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c
> +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c
> @@ -164,8 +164,10 @@ static struct hsr_node *hsr_add_node(struct hsr_priv *hsr,
> * as initialization. (0 could trigger an spurious ring error warning).
> */
> now = jiffies;
> - for (i = 0; i < HSR_PT_PORTS; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < HSR_PT_PORTS; i++) {
> new_node->time_in[i] = now;
> + new_node->time_out[i] = now;
> + }
> for (i = 0; i < HSR_PT_PORTS; i++)
> new_node->seq_out[i] = seq_out;
>
> @@ -411,9 +413,12 @@ void hsr_register_frame_in(struct hsr_node *node, struct hsr_port *port,
> int hsr_register_frame_out(struct hsr_port *port, struct hsr_node *node,
> u16 sequence_nr)
> {
> - if (seq_nr_before_or_eq(sequence_nr, node->seq_out[port->type]))
> + if (seq_nr_before_or_eq(sequence_nr, node->seq_out[port->type]) &&
> + time_is_after_jiffies(node->time_out[port->type] +
> + msecs_to_jiffies(HSR_ENTRY_FORGET_TIME)))
> return 1;
>
> + node->time_out[port->type] = jiffies;
> node->seq_out[port->type] = sequence_nr;
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h
> index 86b43f539f2c..d9628e7a5f05 100644
> --- a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h
> +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct hsr_node {
> enum hsr_port_type addr_B_port;
> unsigned long time_in[HSR_PT_PORTS];
> bool time_in_stale[HSR_PT_PORTS];
> + unsigned long time_out[HSR_PT_PORTS];
> /* if the node is a SAN */
> bool san_a;
> bool san_b;
> diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_main.h b/net/hsr/hsr_main.h
> index 7dc92ce5a134..f79ca55d6986 100644
> --- a/net/hsr/hsr_main.h
> +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_main.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #define HSR_LIFE_CHECK_INTERVAL 2000 /* ms */
> #define HSR_NODE_FORGET_TIME 60000 /* ms */
> #define HSR_ANNOUNCE_INTERVAL 100 /* ms */
> +#define HSR_ENTRY_FORGET_TIME 400 /* ms */
>
> /* By how much may slave1 and slave2 timestamps of latest received frame from
> * each node differ before we notify of communication problem?
> --
> 2.30.0
>

scripts/checkpatch.pl gives errors about DOS line endings but once
that is resolved this looks good. I tested it on an HSR network with
the software implementation and the xrs700x which uses offloading and
everything still works. I don't have a way to force anything on the
HSR network to reuse sequence numbers after 400ms.

Reviewed-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@xxxxxxxxx
Tested-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@xxxxxxxxx